article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (3) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
September 19, 2006

Geothermal Energy Receives Congressional Support

Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Ten Senators urged the Department of Energy to amend its loan guarantee solicitation to include geothermal energy in a bipartisan letter written in response to recent legislation excluding geothermal from the Strategic Plan's mix of eligible renewable energy projects.

"The nation cannot afford to leave a domestic energy alternative as potentially significant as geothermal energy off the table if we are to succeed in changing direction."

-- Karl Gawell, Geothermal Energy Association, executive director

The letter, organized by Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), was also signed by Senators Ensign (R-NV), Boxer (D-CA), Feinstein (D-CA), Craig (R-ID), Crapo (R-ID), Akaka (D-HI), Murkowski (R-AK), Salazar (D-CO) and Hatch (R-UT).

DOE had recently unveiled its program guidelines for a $2 billion loan guarantee program authorized by the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) passed by Congress. According to EPAct, the program was intended to spur "investment in projects that employ new energy technologies." However, DOE officials indicated that geothermal projects would not be eligible for the program.

The bipartisan Senate letter objects to the omission of geothermal, noting that the law includes "a list of projects which 'shall be eligible...'" The Senators point out to Secretary Bodman: "this is not an optional list from which the Department may pick and choose. Congress directed that all those on the list shall be eligible."

In a related event, the Geothermal Energy Association (GEA) released critical comments on DOE's draft Strategic Plan, another plan that also omitted geothermal energy. "In our view, achieving the goals laid out in the Strategic Plan will require every viable energy option available," GEA argued.

"The nation cannot afford to leave a domestic energy alternative as potentially significant as geothermal energy off the table if we are to succeed in changing direction -- in ending our addiction to foreign sources of energy and addressing the serious environmental issues facing us," said Karl Gawell, GEA's Executive Director.

GEA cited recent reports by the National Academy of Sciences, International Energy Agency, and US Government Accountability Office supporting continued -- if not increased funding -- for geothermal research and technology development. "Geothermal energy should be explicitly included as a key part of the Department's new Strategic Plan," GEA's letter said.

In January, DOE's FY 2007 Budget proposed to terminate its geothermal research program. GEA argued to Congress that this would "set back research in this area for decades and threaten US technological leadership in this important renewable technology." Both the House and Senate have approved continued funding for DOE's geothermal research program in FY 2007 -- the House has approved $5 million and the Senate $25 million.

Copies of the Senator's letter to DOE and GEA's comments on the draft DOE Strategic Plan are available from the GEA.
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (3)
 
No image available
September 19, 2006
Finally there is some hope in this matter. We really cannot afford to exclude geothermal from receiving funding for renewable projects. Neither can we afford to exclude free-flowing hydropower development which will also be important in future development.

Both Geothermal and hydropower are not "mature" technologies. There is much more to be developed for both of them over the next few decades.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 3
No image available
September 20, 2006
I agree, unfortunately the US govt. is finding it difficult to change the way things have been for a long time(fossil fuel based economy). I am attempting to learn as much as possible about Geoxchange systems. Any links or info anybody has would be greatly appreciated. So far, from what I've seen, this could be a huge industry that would make living a lot more comfortable with a lot less wasted fuels and energy, as well as cleaner air/less pollution.
Comment 2 of 3
No image available
September 20, 2006
It seems to me that the Department of Energy's Strategic Plan for renewable energy development for the US would be amiss without some allocation for Geothermal and for free flowing water power. Even the meager 5 million from the house and 25 million from the Senate for Geothermal seems like a small amount for such great potential in returns.

Geothermal technology could be inhanced with the use of drilling technology use for extracting natural gas.

Free flowing hydro might include the use of underwater turbines in conjunction with the removal of some of our dams, with tidal flow power generation and with ocean currents.

As we move into the future, we have to distance ourselves more and more from fossil fuels in order to protect our fragile atmosphere and climate.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 3 of 3
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Conserval Systems (SolarWall) SkyFuel bees - bioenergy events & services Alpha Technologies SunWize Technologies Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo