Photo Credit: MSU
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (7) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 17, 2006

Polluted Sites Nationwide Could Become Biofuels Proving Grounds

East Lansing, Michigan [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Growing crops for biofuels summons images of fuel alternatives springing from the rural heartland. But a Michigan State University partnership with DaimlerChrysler is looking at turning industrial brownfields green.

A secondary objective is to examine whether the growing plants actually contribute to bioremediation, meaning they take up contaminants from the soils, without affecting their quality for use in biofuels.

Kurt Thelen, MSU professor of crop and soil sciences, is leading the investigation to examine the possibility that some oilseed crops like soybeans, sunflower and canola, and other crops such as corn and switchgrass, can be grown on abandoned industrial sites, or brownfields, for use in ethanol or biodiesel fuel production. Another partner is NextEnergy, a nonprofit organization that supports energy technology development.

The results of the work conducted here might sprout similar sites across the state and nation in areas that aren't desirable for commercial or residential uses. The results also will contribute crops for biofuel production and may help clean up contaminated soils.

"Right now, brownfields don't grow anything," Thelen said. "This may seem like a drop in the bucket, but we're looking at the possibilities of taking land that isn't productive and using it to both learn and produce."

The project now is a two-acre parcel that is part of a former industrial dump site in Oakland County's Rose Township. Thelen's group is looking to determine if crops grown on brownfield sites can produce adequate yields to make them viable for use in biofuel production. The crops also need to produce adequate quantities of seed oil.

A secondary objective is to examine whether the growing plants actually contribute to bioremediation, meaning they take up contaminants from the soils, without affecting their quality for use in biofuels. This might make them especially useful to grow on contaminated brownfields.

As interest increases in the use of biofuels to offset dependence on fossil fuels, there are challenges on many fronts. Crop researchers are looking at which crops and crop varieties possess the best qualities for this use, and farmers are contemplating new marketing options.

At the same time, engineers are exploring more efficient and effective biofuel production systems. There currently is no national standardized specification for what constitutes B20, a blend of 20 percent biofuel and 80 percent petroleum diesel that is commonly used in diesel engines. Engineers and the government are working to set a standard. When it's established, Thelen hopes to have recommendations ready on the best crop varieties that meet the standards.

"As the chemical engineers work on developing a national spec for B20, we'll grow the crops in the marginal areas and see if they can meet it," Thelen said. "We're replicating our study on campus on good agricultural land to compare yields and the quality of biofuel produced from an agricultural land base versus a marginal brownfield land base and see if there's a difference in yield and quality of biofuel."

The three-year study is supported by DaimlerChrysler, NextEnergy and Project GREEEN (Generating Research and Extension to meet Economic and Environmental Needs), the state's plant industry initiative at MSU. The study also is supported by the MSU Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station.

DaimlerChrysler has been selling the Jeep Liberty SUV with a diesel engine, and beginning in early 2007 it will offer a diesel-powered Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV. In both cases, the vehicles are fueled with B5 (5 percent biodiesel fuel) at the factory. This fall, the company will approve use of B20 in the Dodge Ram diesel pickup for fleet customers who use fuel that meets the current military fuel quality specification.

"Biofuel production is going to require a significant land base to meet future production expectations," Thelen said. "Use of marginal lands or sites not preferable for food crops is a good idea. We'll be looking at whether it is something that might offer multiple benefits."
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (7)
 
No image available
August 17, 2006
I read that in another country, crops are being used to remove contaminants from soil because certain plants concentrate hazardous chemicals. I think it was on a greenpeace website. I do not remember if the plants were then used for any other purpose.

Even water plants (water lilys) can be used to economically extract pollutants from contaminated water. However, I do not have sufficient knowledge as to determine whether any type of vegetation containing high amounts of pollutants could be safely used to produce biodiesel.

If, during the processing of the plant material, the contaminants could be removed, I would see no obstacle.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 7
No image available
August 17, 2006
Buddy I am with you. I do not think it is a smart option for them to do but this is the smart option to clean up a super-fund sight of it's contaminates.
If the first plants are removed and burned at 3000 degrees F in an O2 less environment i think they can deal with the waste correctly. This might help clean up Lead and Mercury contaminated soils as well as PCB contaminated soils.
Now they remove the contaminated top soil and ship it to a waste site for it. Which to me is worst , they take it out of one pocket and put it into another. My way the problem is solved.
Hope it makes sense.
D~W
Comment 2 of 7
No image available
August 17, 2006
Is this smart? If these brownfields are contaminated and the crops are capable of taking up contaminants from the soils, then are we considering burning the result in IC engines?

Unless the reformation process is capable of removing all the contaminants from the fuel, (and then they are disposed of properly), this sounds bad.
Comment 3 of 7
August 18, 2006
It sounds like they just plan to use brown sites for studies, not for mass production. There are not enough brown sites to make a meaningful difference in actual production.
Comment 4 of 7
No image available
August 18, 2006
If the existing plants as well as the new crops are used as feedstock for the production of syngas through gasification there shouldn't be any problem with contamination. Scrubbers during the gasification process will remove their molecular components from the syngas.

The syngas can be used to help generate electricity and even be used to convert to ethanol and other "green" chemicals and products.

I think the process of fertilization and cultivation of these "brownfields" will, over time, clear the topsoil of pre-existing toxins.

http://bioconversion.blogspot.com
Comment 5 of 7
No image available
August 18, 2006
My daughter in law used to work on bioremediation ( which doenst make me an expert!). Primary problem was getting the damn plants to grow on the heavily polluted sites. Once you have done that hopefully the plant concentrates the pollutant somewhere easy to concentrate futher. Then if you have a high enough concentration you hope there is an industrial ( often mining) process which will do something useful with the ash. If you are going for biofuels there are probably going to be cleaning processes, which may need enhancement. However overall , if the government has standards for biodiesel quality, these problems will either be solved by the smart guys working on them, or they wont be able to sell their product. If government standards are badly thought out then worry about pollution, because no commercial organisation is going to waste money cleaning up when they dont need to.
Comment 6 of 7
No image available
August 23, 2006
Nice discussion since we have targeted a 66 acre brownfield at the Brunswick Naval Air Station and plan to revitalize it with byproducts from our bio-mass refineries and manure gasifier; eventually growing grasses suitable for one of the bio-refineries.

Even oil spills can be reduced by microbacteria; but it appears we need to set standards based on a toxic waste analysis. Plants can produce toxic substances as any visitor to a poison ivy infested island will understand.

If one sets these hurdles too high; then nothing gets done. Enormous quantities of soil are removed and carted somewhere else. What was accomplished?

I think organic lifeforms can cleanse soils over time; but we need to discuss how much and how long before we start digging up everyone's 'contaminated' flower and vegetable gardens.
Comment 7 of 7
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
BP Solar Prism Solar Technologies, Inc HUBER+SUHNER Blue Sky Energy, Inc. OPEL Solar, Inc. Solar Energy International
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo