Photo Credit: WindStor
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (17) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
July 10, 2006

Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Under Construction

Ishpeming, Michigan [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Construction is currently under way this month on a rare wind energy project, a 200 kilowatt (kW) vertical-axis wind turbine outside a large residential complex in Michigan.

"Pioneer Bluff is an all-electric facility, so electricity costs are quite high. The wind turbine will generate more than half of the electricity needed to run the facility."

-- Evelyn Valente-Heikkala, Ishpeming Housing Commission, executive director

Vertical axis turbines, as opposed to horizontal axis turbines, are best described as looking like large eggbeaters, where a series of curved, swooping blades capture the wind to spin a centrally mounted, vertically oriented hub.

The reality is that the wind power industry worldwide has unilaterally chosen the horizontal axis configuration as the chosen design and all large scale turbines have evolved in that direction. This hasn't stopped entrepreneurial pioneers like McKenzie Bay International, whose WindStor Power Co. aims to prove that there is indeed more than one option for wind turbine design.

WindStor recently secured a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA)with The Ishpeming Housing Commission, which manages the Pioneer Bluff senior citizen apartment complex in Ishpeming, Michigan, where the new turbine will be installed. Contractors are putting the final touches on the large concrete foundation for the turbine and full installation is expected by the end of July.

The turbine is designed to rotate at a maximum speed of 50 rpm and reach its rated power output of 200 kW at wind speeds of 12m/s (26.84 mph), says the company, which expects the turbine to produce approximately 500,000 kWh per year in average wind speeds of 7m/s (15.66 mph).

"The wind turbine will generate electricity to be fed into the 88 unit low-income senior apartment building, serving as a supplement to the electricity currently supplied by the Upper Peninsula Power Co.," said Evelyn Valente-Heikkala, executive director of the Ishpeming Housing Commission. "Pioneer Bluff is an all-electric facility, so electricity costs are quite high. The wind turbine will generate more than half of the electricity needed to run the facility."

A state-based organization has helped move the project along. WindStor and more than 60 additional organizations and companies are a part of Michigan GREEN, a group of energy companies and energy consultants, together with government agencies and schools, colleges and universities that have joined forces to champion the cause of providing economic renewable energy generation and education at schools in Michigan and the nation.

The project isn't the first either. Since October of 2004, WindStor has had a similar, yet smaller, 100 kW vertical axis wind turbine operating at the Universite due Quebec en Abitibi-Temiscamingue in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada. This latest, however, will be twice the size and a further validation of the design.

For more construction photographs, see the second link below.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (17)
 
No image available
July 10, 2006
I hope Michigan GREEN will be able to secure many more renewable energy projects in the near future. It matters not whether the wind turbines are horizontal or vertical as long as they function efficiently to produce electricity.

Perhaps the vertical type could be used closer to radar installations. I do not know if radar interference objections raised to horizontal propeller turbines at the present time would apply to the vertical types. The regulations recently passed that temporarily blanket out use of the horizontal type turbines near US radar installations may not apply here.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 17
No image available
July 10, 2006
I'm surprised a Darrieus can produce power at such a low RPM. I thought they had to really get cruising. I suppose in the end it's all a matter of diameter...

I still think the shrouded savonius designs are more attractive from a "bird friendly" standpoint, but this is neat. I hope it works out well.
Comment 2 of 17
No image available
July 10, 2006
Great to get away from the old propeller planes!

Any chance of a spiral screw type that could be fixed along the pitched roof of every domestic dwelling?
Comment 3 of 17
No image available
July 11, 2006
These are interesting because there is a DG market that is not being filled. You cannot easily buy a 200kW HAWT, as the market is either very small or very large. Large turbines are quite hard to site in DG applications, and 10kW turbines are expensive due to their small size. VAWT do not require tall masts and may be easier to permit in DG applications. Of course, all this is theoretical until McKenzie establishes a track record.
Comment 4 of 17
No image available
July 11, 2006
"are they less noisy ? ... therefore suitable on residential buildings ? "
Well, since the only noise from propeller types is the whoosh from the blade , if there's a difference, it will probably be because of the smaller size of the vertical unit shown here.
Comment 5 of 17
No image available
July 11, 2006
Obviously this verticle blade was chosen because they didn't require a large output and wanted to keep costs down. There are apparently better vertical designs (they don't look like egg beaters)
that are being tested and are slated for the tops of buildings. Vertical blades simply aren't as efficent as propeller types so far, at least not for large commercial installations. I think vertical look best in residential areas, and propeller look very good when sited away from buildings. Propeller types are very impressive and beautiful when sited on the flat prairies or the ocean shore or offshore.
Comment 6 of 17
No image available
July 11, 2006
Their website say's:
"Awarded "International Energy Project of the Year" for 2005 by the Association of Energy Engineers in April, 2005. "

but no clear comparison anywhere of the benefits of these vertical axis turbines vs. the competing horizontal axis turbines.

are the cheaper ?

are the less noisy ? ... therefore suitable on residential buildings ?
Comment 7 of 17
No image available
July 12, 2006
NASA built a few of these in the early days of wind turbines. The lack of pitch and area into the wind control makes these harder to operate. Is this a wild frequency generator with PM or wound rotor? Either will require an inverter to convert to 60Hz? Still a significant brake is needed to stop rotation at any wind condition. Also a starting motor is needed to start rotation.
The cost will match a typical wind turbine of the same power.
Comment 8 of 17
No image available
July 12, 2006
so dose the wind direction of the fans suck in the birds?
Comment 9 of 17
No image available
July 12, 2006
I like their turbines that power the new World Trade Center tower building in NY - oh wait - I guess they never actually did that one either! Geez what a surprise. No shortage of inaccurate press releases from these guys, right? Hey, didn't these guys have a design with tetrahedron-shaped frames top and bottom? Wasn't that their big technological breakthrough? What happened to that? Ah, well, so their main differentiating factor has now dissappeared - still, they know what they're doing, right?! Oh well, more vaporware...
Comment 10 of 17
No image available
July 12, 2006
Re birds: isn't the axial diameter of a darrieus smaller than a comparable HAWT ? Seems there should be fewer bird strikes, not more.

Re efficiency: doesn't a properly designed VAWT activate at a lower wind speed than a HAWT designed to produce the same peak power ?

Thanks.
LC
Comment 11 of 17
No image available
I assume these types of wind generators are more compact and therefore suitable for urban type areas.

Another point though is that I would guess they are more dangerous to birds which would be more likely to get injured because if they fly into the effective cage, if it is spinning at 50rpm it would seem likely they would collide with the blades on exit.
Comment 12 of 17
No image available
July 12, 2006
A new 25 kW VAWT design is now being demonstrated by Terra Moya Agua, Inc. (TMA) from Cheyenne, WY. It uses a modified (and patented) savonius-type of rotor arrangement that is very efficient, produces lift and and has a tip speed ratio exceeding unity. The increased efficiency is the result of computational analysis and wind tunnel tuning at CPP, Inc. You can check it out at the TMA web site (www.tmawind.com). No bird-kill. No harmonics. Better that the darius designs.
Comment 13 of 17
No image available
August 20, 2006
I can personally support what Mr. Johnston says about the TMA turbine (comment # 8). It is ready to go on line, and will do so before the end of August. This machine is expected to produce 25 kW at about 30 mph wind, and continue producing up to 60+ mph. Taking advantage of the cubing effect it could produce 125 kW with a larger genset at 60 mph. Put some in a class 7 wind regime and you will have a serious capacity factor.
Comment 14 of 17
No image available
November 6, 2006
I am looking to build something like this for my farm in New Zealand. I am currently in the research phase and surprised how little information there is on the internet. Does anyone know of small scale vertical axis turbines used to power domestic dwellings...? Any help / links much appreciated.
Comment 15 of 17
No image available
May 30, 2008
This website and those interested in wind generators that have
1) low initial cost,
2) low maintainence as well as
3) unbelievable efficiency
check out Mass Megawatts Wind Power Inc.
Comment 16 of 17
No image available
Anonymous
August 31, 2009
I was just wondering what happened to this project? I stopped to see it two weeks ago while I was in the area. Nothing to see but a vertical shaft located surprisingly close to the building. There are still piles of leftover dirt, but nothing in progress. Why wasn't it completed?
Comment 17 of 17
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
ReflecTech, Inc. Geothermal Energy Association Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Morningstar Corporation Comdel ATAS International, Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo