Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Under Construction

July 10, 2006   |   17 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Pioneer Bluff is an all-electric facility, so electricity costs are quite high. The wind turbine will generate more than half of the electricity needed to run the facility."

-- Evelyn Valente-Heikkala, Ishpeming Housing Commission, executive director
17 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 17
July 10, 2006
I hope Michigan GREEN will be able to secure many more renewable energy projects in the near future. It matters not whether the wind turbines are horizontal or vertical as long as they function efficiently to produce electricity.

Perhaps the vertical type could be used closer to radar installations. I do not know if radar interference objections raised to horizontal propeller turbines at the present time would apply to the vertical types. The regulations recently passed that temporarily blanket out use of the horizontal type turbines near US radar installations may not apply here.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
2 of 17
July 10, 2006
I'm surprised a Darrieus can produce power at such a low RPM. I thought they had to really get cruising. I suppose in the end it's all a matter of diameter...

I still think the shrouded savonius designs are more attractive from a "bird friendly" standpoint, but this is neat. I hope it works out well.
Comment
3 of 17
July 10, 2006
Great to get away from the old propeller planes!

Any chance of a spiral screw type that could be fixed along the pitched roof of every domestic dwelling?
Comment
4 of 17
July 11, 2006
These are interesting because there is a DG market that is not being filled. You cannot easily buy a 200kW HAWT, as the market is either very small or very large. Large turbines are quite hard to site in DG applications, and 10kW turbines are expensive due to their small size. VAWT do not require tall masts and may be easier to permit in DG applications. Of course, all this is theoretical until McKenzie establishes a track record.
Comment
5 of 17
July 11, 2006
"are they less noisy ? ... therefore suitable on residential buildings ? "
Well, since the only noise from propeller types is the whoosh from the blade , if there's a difference, it will probably be because of the smaller size of the vertical unit shown here.
Comment
6 of 17
July 11, 2006
Obviously this verticle blade was chosen because they didn't require a large output and wanted to keep costs down. There are apparently better vertical designs (they don't look like egg beaters)
that are being tested and are slated for the tops of buildings. Vertical blades simply aren't as efficent as propeller types so far, at least not for large commercial installations. I think vertical look best in residential areas, and propeller look very good when sited away from buildings. Propeller types are very impressive and beautiful when sited on the flat prairies or the ocean shore or offshore.
Comment
7 of 17
July 11, 2006
Their website say's:
"Awarded "International Energy Project of the Year" for 2005 by the Association of Energy Engineers in April, 2005. "

but no clear comparison anywhere of the benefits of these vertical axis turbines vs. the competing horizontal axis turbines.

are the cheaper ?

are the less noisy ? ... therefore suitable on residential buildings ?
Comment
8 of 17
July 12, 2006
NASA built a few of these in the early days of wind turbines. The lack of pitch and area into the wind control makes these harder to operate. Is this a wild frequency generator with PM or wound rotor? Either will require an inverter to convert to 60Hz? Still a significant brake is needed to stop rotation at any wind condition. Also a starting motor is needed to start rotation.
The cost will match a typical wind turbine of the same power.
Comment
9 of 17
July 12, 2006
so dose the wind direction of the fans suck in the birds?
Comment
10 of 17
July 12, 2006
I like their turbines that power the new World Trade Center tower building in NY - oh wait - I guess they never actually did that one either! Geez what a surprise. No shortage of inaccurate press releases from these guys, right? Hey, didn't these guys have a design with tetrahedron-shaped frames top and bottom? Wasn't that their big technological breakthrough? What happened to that? Ah, well, so their main differentiating factor has now dissappeared - still, they know what they're doing, right?! Oh well, more vaporware...
Comment
11 of 17
July 12, 2006
Re birds: isn't the axial diameter of a darrieus smaller than a comparable HAWT ? Seems there should be fewer bird strikes, not more.

Re efficiency: doesn't a properly designed VAWT activate at a lower wind speed than a HAWT designed to produce the same peak power ?

Thanks.
LC
Comment
12 of 17
I assume these types of wind generators are more compact and therefore suitable for urban type areas.

Another point though is that I would guess they are more dangerous to birds which would be more likely to get injured because if they fly into the effective cage, if it is spinning at 50rpm it would seem likely they would collide with the blades on exit.
Comment
13 of 17
July 12, 2006
A new 25 kW VAWT design is now being demonstrated by Terra Moya Agua, Inc. (TMA) from Cheyenne, WY. It uses a modified (and patented) savonius-type of rotor arrangement that is very efficient, produces lift and and has a tip speed ratio exceeding unity. The increased efficiency is the result of computational analysis and wind tunnel tuning at CPP, Inc. You can check it out at the TMA web site (www.tmawind.com). No bird-kill. No harmonics. Better that the darius designs.
Comment
14 of 17
August 20, 2006
I can personally support what Mr. Johnston says about the TMA turbine (comment # 8). It is ready to go on line, and will do so before the end of August. This machine is expected to produce 25 kW at about 30 mph wind, and continue producing up to 60+ mph. Taking advantage of the cubing effect it could produce 125 kW with a larger genset at 60 mph. Put some in a class 7 wind regime and you will have a serious capacity factor.
Comment
15 of 17
November 6, 2006
I am looking to build something like this for my farm in New Zealand. I am currently in the research phase and surprised how little information there is on the internet. Does anyone know of small scale vertical axis turbines used to power domestic dwellings...? Any help / links much appreciated.
Comment
16 of 17
May 30, 2008
This website and those interested in wind generators that have
1) low initial cost,
2) low maintainence as well as
3) unbelievable efficiency
check out Mass Megawatts Wind Power Inc.
No image available
Comment
17 of 17
Anonymous
August 31, 2009
I was just wondering what happened to this project? I stopped to see it two weeks ago while I was in the area. Nothing to see but a vertical shaft located surprisingly close to the building. There are still piles of leftover dirt, but nothing in progress. Why wasn't it completed?
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Zep Solar SMA America, LLC SkyFuel Latin American Wind Energy Association (LAWEA) Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. K2 Solar,Inc. Black & Veatch Corporation
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters