Photo Credit: BFRL
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (10) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
July 21, 2006

U.S. Begins Solar Photovoltaic Module Testing

[RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

With roof-top solar photovoltaic (PV) systems rapidly growing in popularity, the U.S. Government is stepping into the PV module testing arena, beginning with a new testing facility at the Federal Government's Building and Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL).

In addition to the electrical performance of the photovoltaic roofing samples, measurements are made of the coincident ambient temperature, wind speed, and solar radiation incident upon the samples.

The laboratory was recently commissioned to deploy a Roof Photovoltaic Test Facility to provide the data needed to develop, improve and validate the needed simulation models for module testing.

In order to accurately predict the annual energy production of photovoltaic systems for any given geographical location, building orientation, and photovoltaic cell technology, models are needed that can accurately predict the response of photovoltaic systems for a wide range of environmental conditions.

The facility is configured to accommodate six residential (sloped roof) and three commercial (flat roof) photovoltaic roofing products. The majority of the currently installed products are referred to as building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV), as they provide both protection against the elements and produce electrical power.

The electrical output of each photovoltaic product is measured every five seconds, with average values for these quantities being saved at five-minute intervals. The characteristic current versus voltage (IV) curve is periodically swept throughout the day for each test specimen.

In addition to the electrical performance of the photovoltaic roofing samples, measurements are made of the coincident ambient temperature, wind speed, and solar radiation incident upon the samples. In addition, measurements of diffuse and beam solar irradiance are made by an adjacent meteorological station.

The nine PV roofing products being monitored over the next 15 months fall within three general categories of photovoltaic cell technology -- single crystalline, poly crystalline, and amorphous silicon -- while embodying different manufacturing processes, materials and design features. The combination of features makes each of the nine roofing products unique and well suited to capture the robustness of simulation models used to predict their electrical performance.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (10)
 
No image available
July 21, 2006
It's a good thing that the Feds are moving to
standardize test procedures to compare technologies under varying conditions. If the tests are valid (that is, more valid than the auto crash tests were for many years) they serve to focus industry efforts to improve efficiencies. If the tests are invalid, they will lead companies astray in their product changes. That is why all tests absolutely HAVE to be well thought out ,
or they may very well do more harm than good,
which is just what the auto crash tests did for all those years.
Comment 1 of 10
No image available
July 26, 2006
the results will never be made public because the lack of consumer information will alow them to continue to steal from us
Comment 2 of 10
No image available
July 26, 2006
The people really need such testing, but the results should be public; and the results should include cost-effectiveness. The CA PUC did an analysis of a P-V schoolsite installation and came up with a $.25 per kilowatt-hour cost over 25 years - based on a 10-year loan. Unfortunately our district financed the project over 20 years, so our cost will be even higher. The installed cost was $8.33 per watt - even with rebates - vice DOE's goal of $1 per watt. With electricity costing $.14 per peak kilowatt-hour, it doesn't look like we made a very good deal. Hopefully the government's new 50%-cell-efficiency project will be successful, and
P-V will finally become cost-effective.
Comment 3 of 10
No image available
July 26, 2006
I am greatly impressed with this testing as I have had interest in pursuing installation of this type of a photovoltaic system on a commercial setting for several months. With nothing but the mfgr's. stated system efficiency and the high ROI, the cost of these systems are prohibitive and the gamble too great. I will be watching for future results from this testing on which to base my decision. Thank you.
Comment 4 of 10
No image available
July 26, 2006
Another concern with this project, being funded and administered by the "government", is which PV manufacturers will be given the resulting data. If this taxpayer funded and publicly owned wealth of long-term data is given to only a select few manufacturers and not to all qualified competitors, one can be sure that the technology will be exploited to the benefit of those few to their own shareholders interests rather than the best public interest.
The pharmaceutical industry is a perfect example of this business strategy.
Jim Duncan

http://fairtax.org
Comment 5 of 10
No image available
July 26, 2006
Would simply ask....WHO SELECTED THE NINE ? Were they totally random....drawn from a "drum" full off business cards ?

What century shall we test Professors/Doctors/Physicists- Laing(s)solar devicewww.pyronsolar.com ?
Respectfully submitted, prm jr.


I will be surprised if any device breaks 20 % efficiency....how 'bout QUOTE 37.3 USDE UNQUOTE ?
Comment 6 of 10
No image available
July 27, 2006
Just a reminder that PV's are only part of the installation. The inverter technology interfacing the PV's to the grid can make a performance difference as well. As more countries world wide implement feed in tarifs overall long term performance is what counts.
Comment 7 of 10
No image available
July 28, 2006
In addition, it is important to know that "performance" can be a deceptive term. While thin-film modules have a lower efficiency than silicon modules, they can also convert diffuse sunlight. As a result, they produce power for more hours each day (they start earlier and finish later) then silicon modules. This is why experienced system integrators in Europe have observer *higher* yearly output from thin-film systems despite "lower" performance characteristics. Higher output per year, combined with significantly lower prices than silicon-modules mark a path toward cost-effectiveness.
Comment 8 of 10
No image available
July 28, 2006
I have to disagree: performance is not what counts, but rather the price/performance ratio. If the performance of PV modules doubles but their prices triple, PV will still not be cost-effective. This is why fans of PV should pay close attention to thin-film modules being produced by companies like First Solar and Nano Solar. Their performance (in terms of efficiency of conversion from light to electricity) is lower than that of the silicon modules that make up over 90% of todays yearly installed capacity (though their efficiency is forecast to surpass that of silicon modules within a few years). But their cost of production is dramatically cheaper, allowing much more aggressive pricing.
Comment 9 of 10
No image available
July 29, 2006
Its about time the government showed an interest in the smart technology. Maybe we can see a drop in prices of PV technology so the average Joe can afford it.
Comment 10 of 10
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Stoel Rives LLP Alteris Renewables UL University Intertek Magnum Energy Inc. Third Sun Solar and Wind Power, Ltd.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo