article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (11) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
July 17, 2006

Supermarkets and Service Stations Now Competing for Grain

by Lester R. Brown, Earth Policy Institute

Cars, not people, will claim most of the increase in world grain consumption this year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that world grain use will grow by 20 million tons in 2006. Of this, 14 million tons will be used to produce fuel for cars in the United States, leaving only 6 million tons to satisfy the world's growing food needs.

There are alternatives to using food-based fuels. For example, the equivalent of the 3 percent gain in automotive fuel supplies from ethanol could be achieved several times over -- and at a fraction of the cost -- simply by raising auto fuel efficiency standards by 20 percent.

In agricultural terms, the world appetite for automotive fuel is insatiable. The grain required to fill a 25-gallon SUV gas tank with ethanol will feed one person for a year. The grain to fill the tank every two weeks over a year will feed 26 people.

Investors are jumping on the highly profitable biofuel-bandwagon so fast that hardly a day goes by without another ethanol distillery or biodiesel refinery being announced somewhere in the world. The amount of corn used in U.S. ethanol distilleries has tripled in five years, jumping from 18 million tons in 2001 to an estimated 55 million tons from the 2006 crop.

In some U.S. Corn Belt states, ethanol distilleries are taking over the corn supply. In Iowa, a staggering 55 ethanol plants are operating or have been proposed. Iowa State University economist Bob Wisner observes that if all these plants are built, they would use virtually all the corn grown in Iowa. In South Dakota, a top-ten corn-growing state, ethanol distilleries are already claiming over half of the corn harvest.

With so many distilleries being built, livestock and poultry producers fear there may not be enough corn to produce meat, milk, and eggs. And since the United States supplies 70 percent of world corn exports, corn-importing countries are worried about their supply.

Since almost everything we eat can be converted into fuel for automobiles, including wheat, corn, rice, soybeans, and sugarcane, the line between the food and energy economies is disappearing. Historically, food processors and livestock producers that converted these farm commodities into products for supermarket shelves were the only buyers. Now there is another group, those buying for the ethanol distilleries and biodiesel refineries that supply service stations.

As the price of oil climbs, it becomes increasingly profitable to convert farm commodities into automotive fuel, either ethanol or biodiesel. In effect, the price of oil becomes the support price for food commodities. Whenever the food value of a commodity drops below its fuel value, the market will convert it into fuel.

Crop-based fuel production is now concentrated in Brazil, the United States, and Western Europe. The United States and Brazil each produced over 4 billion gallons (16 billion liters) of ethanol in 2005. While Brazil uses sugarcane as the feedstock, U.S. distillers use grain -- mostly corn. The 55 million tons of U.S. corn going into ethanol this year represent nearly one sixth of the country's grain harvest but will supply only 3 percent of its automotive fuel. (For additional data, see www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2006/Update55_data.htm.)

Brazil, the world's largest sugar producer and exporter, is now converting half of its sugar harvest into fuel ethanol. With just 10 percent of the world's sugar harvest going into ethanol, the price of sugar has doubled. Cheap sugar may now be history.

In Europe the emphasis is on producing biodiesel. Last year the European Union (EU) produced 1.6 billion gallons of biofuels. Of this, 858 million gallons were biodiesel, produced from vegetable oil, mostly in Germany and France, and 718 million gallons were ethanol, most of it distilled from grain in France, Spain, and Germany. Margarine manufacturers, struggling to compete with subsidized biodiesel refineries, have asked the European Parliament for help.

In Asia, China and India are both building ethanol distilleries. In 2005, China converted some 2 million tons of grain -- mostly corn, but also some wheat and rice -- into ethanol. In India ethanol is produced largely from sugarcane. Thailand is concentrating on ethanol from cassava, while Malaysia and Indonesia are investing heavily in additional palm oil plantations and in new biodiesel refineries. Within the last year or so, Malaysia has approved 32 biodiesel refineries, but recently has suspended further licensing while it assesses the adequacy of palm oil supplies.

The profitability of crop-based fuel production has created an investment juggernaut. With a U.S. ethanol subsidy of 51 cents per gallon in effect until 2010, and with oil priced at $70 per barrel, distilling fuel alcohol from corn promises huge profits for years to come.

In May 2005, the 100th U.S. ethanol distillery came on line. Seven of these distilleries are being expanded. Another 34 or so are under construction and scores more are in the planning stages. The soaring demand for crop-based fuel is coming when world grain stocks are at the lowest level in 34 years and when there are 76 million more people to feed each year.

The U.S. investment in biofuel production in response to runaway oil prices is spiraling out of control, threatening to draw grain away from the production of beef, pork, poultry, milk, and eggs. And, most seriously, the vast number of distilleries in operation, under construction, and in the planning stages threatens to reduce grain available for direct human consumption. Simply put, the stage is being set for a head-on collision between the world's 800 million affluent automobile owners and food consumers. Given the insatiable appetite of cars for fuel, higher grain prices appear inevitable. The only question is when food prices will rise and by how much. Indeed, in recent months, wheat and corn prices have risen by one fifth.

For the 2 billion poorest people in the world, many of whom spend half or more of their income on food, rising grain prices can quickly become life threatening. The broader risk is that rising food prices could spread hunger and generate political instability in low-income countries that import grain, such as Indonesia, Egypt, Nigeria, and Mexico. This instability could in turn disrupt global economic progress. If ethanol distillery demand for grain continues its explosive growth, driving grain prices to dangerous highs, the U.S. government may have to intervene in the unfolding global conflict over food between affluent motorists and low-income consumers.

There are alternatives to using food-based fuels. For example, the equivalent of the 3 percent gain in automotive fuel supplies from ethanol could be achieved several times over -- and at a fraction of the cost -- simply by raising auto fuel efficiency standards by 20 percent. Investing in public transport could reduce overall dependence on cars.

There are other fuel options as well. While there are no alternatives to food for people, there is an alternative source of fuel for cars, one that involves shifting to highly efficient gas-electric hybrid plug-ins. This would enable motorists to do short-distance driving, such as the daily commute, with electricity. If wind-rich countries such as the United States, China, and those in Europe invest heavily in wind farms to feed cheap electricity into the grid, cars could run primarily on wind energy, and at the gasoline equivalent of less than $1 a gallon.


About the author...

Lester R. Brown, founder and President of Earth Policy Institute, is the author of Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble, in which he offers a vision for an environmentally sustainable economy. Brown, whose principal research areas include food, population, water, climate change, and renewable energy, helped pioneer the concept of environmentally sustainable development. Widely sought as a speaker, and the recipient of many awards and honorary degrees, Brown founded Worldwatch Institute in 1974, where he launched the World Watch Papers, the Worldwatch/Norton books, the annual State of the World report, World Watch, the annual Vital Signs, and the Institute's News Briefs.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

Reader Comments (11)
 
No image available
July 17, 2006
Besides being expert and objective, Lester Brown cares. That's why his words ring true. We should not need his careful analysis of the facts to realize that not acting in harmony with Nature and our own hearts must end in deprivation and unhappiness. If we secure the life and happiness of others, we secure our own well-being. If we appreciate and preserve innocent Nature then we honor and preserve the mainstay of our physical existence and the source of so many blessings in our lives. We should turn to renewables and each other, and strive to amass happiness rather than amass wealth. It's fun and fulfilling, and everyone wins. Philip Anderson, Monrovia Maryland
Comment 1 of 11
No image available
July 18, 2006
I drive biodiesel and I love it. Not only Biodiesel, 100% recycled waste oil, b100, from my local area. It's the cream of the crop biodiesel Yet I see our great push towards biofuels as a direct reflection of the Americans great love for the automobile. We've been raised to love cars. We need to invest in public transportation on a massive scale. In my home town of Eugene OR. there was an extensive trolly system that was removed when?...When Ford launched the Model T back in the 1920's. Hmmm. which by the way got better gas milage than any common SUV on todays market..sure, heated seats, LCD DVD to quite the kids, but really, we need to change the paradigm of transportation.
WALK...BIKE....MASS TRANSIT REVOLUTION...CARSHARE...SKATEBOARD.
Comment 2 of 11
No image available
July 19, 2006
I think we are all underestimating just how much oil we consume on a daily basis. Yes, plenty of waste now, yes plenty of left over energy from feedstock now, but just how viable is this grown energy source when facing replacing all fossil fuels? Our energy hunger grows by leaps and bounds year after year, and we are facing a peak production of fossil fuels in the next few years. A common bell curve will cause the math of supply and demand to get real ugly real fast. There's not enough waste corn or byproducts to fill a gap that increases in size by 100% year by year. Study the findings of Drs Duncan and Youngquist from the University of California. They present some sobering estimations of the challenge. We don't have enough corn. But maybe this will solve the fat American syndrome.
Comment 3 of 11
No image available
July 19, 2006
Yet another article highlighting the incredible importance of our mission objective.

Feel free to learn more at: www.syntecbiofuel.com
Comment 4 of 11
No image available
July 19, 2006
No one is lining up to trade in their SUVs to stave off starvation in the world.

A 20% change in fuel efficiency sounds great, but seems to be realistically many years away, even with a potential political shift in November. Plug-in hybrids burning E85 sound great, but the batteries aren't here yet. Cellulosic ethanol is maybe 10-15 years off.

A national move toward self-sufficiency and renewable energy will be evolutionary, but momentum finally exists, and more will be accomplished by dealing with what is than what would be nice.

Incentivize plugin hybrids and cellulosic research, but let's stop talking about talking about implementing standards that simply have no chance of acceptance in the face of car company power and a lack of political will.

No one is going to stop investing in ethanol, when it is highly profitable, to stop world hunger. And what problem were we trying to solve?
Comment 5 of 11
No image available
July 19, 2006
Mr. Brown, like so many of the "ecology movement," has a limited world view. Nothing has more than one use, especially if they don't like that use. Grain is grown (currently) primarily as a direct livestock food source. I.e., a corn kernel goes from ear to cow/pig, or is ground and mixed with something first. Ethanol removes some of the sugars, and leaves a product with better animal nutrition. Everybody wins, except Mr. Brown and EW.
Comment 6 of 11
No image available
July 19, 2006
Methanol (methyl alcohol) should also be considered as an alternative to bioenergy to fuel America's automobiles. It can be produced much more cheaply than ethanol and its feed stocks include wasted (flared) gas associated with crude oil production, coal and many others. In fact, the first flexible fueled vehicles in the USA in the 1980's burned M-85 and methanol blending in gasoline at approximately 5% was rather common. The practice failed because the methanol industry found no or very little support from big oil and governments. This could very easily be resurrected by promoting a very high octane, clean gasoline additive made from America's large coal deposits that could easily be produced at less than $1.00 per gallon.
Comment 7 of 11
No image available
The remarks by Mr. Brown are somewhat confusing since ethanol processing does not consume animal feed but produces it. There is no competition between fuel and feed.

In some areas the growth of the livestock industry is not keeping up with the available feedstuffs from ethanol plants.

The price of corn is increasing due to the draught not ethanol. I am afraid Mr. Brown has his "facts" wrong.

C. Van Milligen
Kentucky Enrichment Inc
www.kentuckyenrichment.com
Comment 8 of 11
No image available
July 20, 2006
I had teenagers once. I know that you can't dictate common sense. The cost of foolishness has to be great enough to be a motivating factor. People waste gas, corn or any other resource because it is cheap enough to be of little concern to them. The shifting energy situation is more than just a long overdue opportunity for farmers, it is the best reason in long time for people to conserve all types of fuel. Supply and demand works wonders in regulating foolishness. It's only a problem if we ignore the opportunities that it presents.
Comment 9 of 11
July 20, 2006
Just wondering out loud here: For years the US has also been demonized for "dumping" corn and other grains on the world market and wreaking havoc with the agricultural economies in developing countries.

Is there any chance that using more corn for ethanol could be good for farmers in poorer countries who don't get the same kind of subsidies that US farmers get for growing corn?

Normally, if demand goes up so too will price, which in turn will drive up investment and opportunity.

Like I said, just thinking out loud here. Feedback and thoughts on this would be appreciated.
Comment 10 of 11
No image available
September 6, 2008
The cleanest burning and cheapest fuel is natural gas and it is renewable. Natural gas is methane. Methane can be produce from organic waste through a process called anaerobic digestion. It is called biogas. Sweden and Germany are generating biomethane and injecting into the grid. They are running vehicles on CNG compressed natural gas. Generating biogas in turn works to solve our waste management problem. No more sending our organic waste to the landfill where it generates methane on its own and leaks into the atmosphere. Sewage plants are a excellent feed stock for anaerobic digestion. Animal waste also. The solids and liquids that are left after the methane is produce can be used as non-petroleum based fertilizer.
Natural gas can be distributed over the existing natural gas grid. No need for tanker trucks to deliver the fuel to fueling stations. With the proper appliance you can even fuel up at home, if natural gas is available.

Forget about ethanol or biodiesel. Compressed natural gas has so many more advantages. Using waste to produce the cleanest burning fuel is sustainable. We are the most wasteful country in the world . The more people the more waste. The more waste the more fuel we can produce.
The advantages of biogas over other biofuels is as follows:
No need to grow crops
Reduces landfills
Can be delivered by pipe rather than tanker truck
Can fuel up at home
Produces non-petroleum based fertilizer
Cleanest burning fuel
Cheapest fuel
Comment 11 of 11
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Schneider Electric American Wire Group Solar Nation UL University Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Canadian Solar Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo