article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (5) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 18, 2006

House Democrats Take a Stand for U.S. Biodiesel

Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

In response to public demand for new direction and leadership to meet the energy needs of America's families, Democrats in the House of Representatives announced a plan to invest in America, grow our energy and establish energy independence. "This plan is homegrown and American-owned," said House Democratic Caucus Chairman James E. Clyburn. The plan, developed by the Rural Working Group, details the opportunities.

"The answer to our fuel crisis is growing in our fields. By investing in biofuels, we are not only making energy more affordable, we are also investing in rural America."

-- Rep. Bob Etheridge (D-N.C.), co-Chair of the Rural Working Group

"The Rural Working Group's proposal includes practical solutions that will expand ethanol and biodiesel production and will make sure that Americans can find flex-fuel vehicles at auto dealerships and biofuels at local gas stations," said Agriculture Committee Ranking Democrat Collin C. Peterson (D-MN).

In the effort to energize America by letting the farmers fuel the nation's new energy independence, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, said "The answer is right here at home. From corn in the Midwest, to soybeans in North Carolina, to sugar beets in Minnesota, we grow the crops that can be converted into the biofuels that power our cars."

Rep. Bob Etheridge (D-N.C.), co-Chair of the Rural Working Group, suggests investing in our own country, rather than abroad. "The answer to our fuel crisis is growing in our fields. By investing in biofuels, we are not only making energy more affordable, we are also investing in rural America. Every dollar we invest in domestic biofuel production is a dollar that stays in America and creates good-paying jobs. It's a win-win situation for America."

Parts of Energizing America call for an increase of production in American-made biofuels by doubling the percentage of renewable fuels sold in America within six years, using biodiesel and cellulosic sources, such as switchgrass. We should extend tax credits for ethanol and biodiesel through 2015 and increase tax benefits to small ethanol producers.

The plan calls for increasing the percentage of "flex-fuel" vehicles that run on ethanol or gasoline. It proposes that in seven years, make 75 percent of all cars made in America flex-fuel cars. It suggests increasing the number of gas stations offering ethanol (E- 85) and biodiesel through new incentives and requirements.

The plan also recommends investing in biofuels research to make biofuel production more efficient and environmentally sound. It asks for cutting-edge research to develop new processes for turning other farm products, such as switchgrass and woodchips, into biofuels. And it urges R&D in new vehicle efficient technologies.

In closing, the report calls for federal incentives to build smaller ethanol and biofuel plants, to allow independent, locally owned facilities that produce biofuels to thrive, thereby improving our rural communities.
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (5)
 
No image available
May 19, 2006
I'm thinking if we could harness the hot air coming out of Washington, we'd be well on our way to energy independence. We've seen more leadership at the State level, than we have federal. The Dems above, are just trying to score points, about 2 years too late, and seizing ANY issue they think will keep their ass in power, or return them to more power. We have scrub land, BLM land, that would hold one hell of a lot of wind turbines, that either the Feds could actually (gasp) make money..not a lot, but some, with low rates, or just allow development on, and get the lease money from. No difference from leasing coal/gas/oil lands than for wind. But instead of being pro-active, they're dragging their feet. Every year we don't act, we're digging ourselves deeper into a hole.
Comment 1 of 5
No image available
May 19, 2006
Kerry,

Most shipping in the US is done with diesel. Be it trains or trucks all of which can can be converted to run on biodiesel.

I am sure you would love to go see the drilling done in your back yard, but there are some places which should not be drilled. For example, in Washington, DC. There may be oil there, but is it worth the cost? We need to think in terms of National Security too. How does getting a few drops of oil matter when you still have to buy imports. I say we can do both save the wildlife and stop the imports.

John Nicholson ---
Comment 2 of 5
No image available
May 19, 2006
Investing in American energy is always a good idea - unfortunately, the Democrats are complete hypocrites, since they have been blocking gas and oil explorations in this country for more than a decade because they are under the thumb of the Sierra Club and other extremist environmental groups. It's a lot easier to drill for oil and gas than it is to create an entirely new fuel system
like biodiesel, a fuel looking for a vehicle.
Neither I nor 100 million other AMericans can use biodiesel now nor in the near future. I'm not arguing one or the other. I'm arguing for both.
Comment 3 of 5
No image available
May 20, 2006
In regards to the Demo Party energy plan, I think it's FLUFF! They are changing gears to win votes for the '08. Now regardless of party sides, we (Americans) need to do everything (oil, gas, wind, ocean, bio) to keep focused on INDEPENDANCE. The BIO-D and Ethanol industries need to contract the farmers to empower the farmer. The farmer is sustained with a contract annual price with free fuel for the crop. From this guarntee, the farmer will be paid for the crop at a 60-75% of the global market price. Fuel allone consumes 30-45% of the farmer's budget. There should be regional collection and conversion sites. This plan should not rely on Fed. subsidies. They end up getting Farmers in trouble.
Comment 4 of 5
No image available
May 20, 2006
Around May 1st, CSPAN had Exxon Chairman, a Rex something explain they are applying technology in their oil exploration. Right now, they have a off-shore oil drilling platform off the coast of Russia. From this platform, they are drilling down and then horizontal into the coastlands. Why can't the oil groups do that in the Artic cycle?
Comment 5 of 5
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
High Sun Engineering Applied Materials Trina Solar Ltd. bees - bioenergy events & services Conergy Inc. Prism Solar Technologies, Inc
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo