Photo Credit: Thermodynamics
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (12) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 15, 2006

Canada to Slash Last Remaining Federal Solar Program

by Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Ottawa, Canada [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

While solar energy advocates in the U.S. may look longingly to Japan or Europe where government support is strongest, Rob McMonagle, President of the Canadian Solar Energy Industries Association, is envious of his neighbor to the south.

"There's a slash and burn going on right now in Canada to eliminate anything that doesn't fit into the Conservative agenda. Just as we're starting to get going as an industry, firing on one cylinder, there was this change in the Federal Government."

-- Rob McMonagle, Canadian Solar Energy Industries Association, president

Support for solar in the U.S. has almost single-handedly been supported by state policies. But now, even the lukewarm U.S. Federal support will greatly eclipse its northern neighbor. Under the new Conservative party control of the Stephen Harper administration, the Canadian Federal government has slashed funding for the only federal solar program in the country.

Currently there are no programs at the Canadian federal level that support solar photovoltaic (PV) power, but the one remaining program that supports solar thermal is likely to get the ax under the federal budget released last week. The Renewable Energy Deployment Initiative (REDI) provides a modest CAD $5 million to subsidize 25 percent of the installation costs for commercial-scale solar thermal project.

"There's a slash and burn going on right now in Canada to eliminate anything that doesn't fit into the Conservative agenda," McMonagle said. "Just as we're starting to get going as an industry, firing on one cylinder, there was this change in the Federal Government."

McMonagle said the budget released last week slashed funding for any type of global warming or Kyoto protocol related program. Some class of "clean air" initiative is expected later this summer from the Harper government, but McMonagle is highly doubtful it will include any effort to support clean energy, particularly solar.

The ironic backdrop to this Federal program cut is that Canadian provincial support has moved the other direction altogether with provinces such as Nova Scotia, British Columbia and, most recently, Ontario, establishing support mechanisms and programs to support renewable energy.

Less than a month ago, Ontario was widely hailed for passing its long-term Standard Offer Contract, which is modeled after the same landmark "feed-in" rebate policies that have made European countries like Germany and Spain beacons for renewable energy use around the world.

On some levels, this disconnect between Canadian provinces and the Federal government that echoes the situation in the U.S. where state policies have been the greatest supporters of renewable energy while the U.S. Federal government -- despite a crescendo of rhetoric -- has been rather restrained.

But nowhere is a Federal void of support for renewable energy -- even downright hostility towards it -- more apparent than in Canada, says Peter Allen, President of Thermodynamics, manufacturers of flat-plate solar thermal collectors, and an example of a domestic Canadian manufacturer that will be affected by the expected dissolving of the last solar thermal program.

"I didn't expect anything interesting from Mr. Harper and his Conservative party," Allen said. "They have a hostile attitude toward the environment and renewable energy. The handwriting is on the wall, they're just more interested in burning oil."

Allen's company, based in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, is a relatively small operation with around CAD $1 million in yearly revenue split equally between domestic and international sales. He says he knows of a dozen commercial solar thermal projects that are on hold or will shortly be cancelled altogether because the Federal funds for the REDI program have been frozen.

Allen says that "folks like to slam the U.S." for its inaction on global warming and the Kyoto protocol but he says there's a major disconnect between what Canadians think Canada is doing for clean energy and the environment, and what it are actually doing. Canada previously joined other nations in agreeing to the terms of the international global warming treaty, the Kyoto protocol, but Allen says little has been done besides the symbolic Canadian signature.

He added that the U.S. has done much better in terms of supporting renewable energy by being up front about not supporting the Kyoto agreement but making sure there is some funding for renewable energy programs. In fact, Allen said, funding has increased overall under the Bush Administration, while his own country, even under its previous Liberal administration, has done little for renewables at the federal level.

The Canadian Parliament is widely expected to pass the budget that will shut down the REDI solar thermal program indefinitely, leaving all policy support for solar energy up to the provinces.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (12)
 
May 15, 2006
In Toronto our insolation beats Miami in july and august.we have better insolation than germany.can you tell we have a shill for the dinosaur juice business in power?
Comment 1 of 12
May 15, 2006
You don't need AZ sun to make solar work and work well...

.....Bill
Comment 2 of 12
No image available
May 15, 2006
I'm not familiar enough with Canadian politics.
Maybe Canada doesn't have the solar energy potential of
say, Arizona?
Comment 3 of 12
No image available
May 16, 2006
It is regretable that conservatives in the Canadian Parliament have dissociated themselves with the development of solar energy just at a time when some of the provinces have shown so much interest. I think it would be to the best interests of all Canadians that solar development be assisted.

Lack of social understanding of the importance of renewables is apparent or the Conservatives would never have disconnected funding in this manner. The problem may be in establishing priorities at the cabinet leve of government. I think that renewables should be at the top of the list but apparently, this is not so in the thinking of the conservatives.

I believe that all forms of renewables should be provided with some degree of government aid as renewables replace fossil fuels.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 4 of 12
No image available
May 16, 2006
You don't need AZ sun to make solar work and work well..
If that's so, then why does the solar industry of Canada need corporate welfare ? If solar in Canada can't stand on its own feet economically,
then it's not worth pursuing.
Comment 5 of 12
No image available
May 17, 2006
The Conservatives were right to shut down the solar program. In many places, Solar is unreliable (clouds, rain, winter) and expensives compared to its peers. It often turns into just another government welfare/jobs program.

Why waste money on over priced solar, when the same money will do more good with Wind for less money?

On a dollar cost ratio, Wind in Canada is more effecient and costs less than Solar on an annual basis for what has been produced. Canada should not buy a single Solar cell until all of the cheaper Wind power is tapped.

The Conservative's energy program is the most effecient way to help the enviroment and the pocket book. That's why the Liberals are so confused.
Comment 6 of 12
No image available
May 17, 2006
It would be very interesting to me to see if the renewable energy industry could "stand on it's own feet" in Canada and the USA if it received proportionally the same level of "corporate wellfare" "subsidies and support" that the "dinosaur juice" industry receives. In Canada right now and in Alaska, the federal and provincial/state governments are looking at providing hundreds of Millions of dollars in grants and Subsidies to promote pipelines to permit oil/natural gas from Alaska and Northern Canada to be shipped down to the lower 48 states.
Comment 7 of 12
No image available
May 17, 2006
As a Canadian, am I disappointed that we aren't making great strides with solar? Of course, but solar just isn't as viable in Canada as it is in the southwest, and we still get a greater percentage of our energy from renewable sources such as hydro and tidal than the US does. With that said, you can never be too environmentally conscious, and I would really like to see Mr. Harper put more thought into our ecological future, if not in solar, than in something else.
Comment 8 of 12
No image available
May 17, 2006
Ontario now has a solar feed-in tariff equal to any in Europe..And solar efficiency goes DOWN if pv materials overheat..This is why Ont. (and other provs) should be taking a lead in PV instead of having to infight fed politicos - is it any wonder considering the intellectual level of these so-called public servants!?

On the other hand, they are in dismantling mode right now concerning everything former gov connected, but that is no excuse for blind ostrichism and BE A GOOD CONSERVATIVE KEEP THE MONEY & JOBS FLOWING; KYOTO BE DA***D, CAUSE THAT WAS THE OTHER GUYS!
Comment 9 of 12
No image available
May 18, 2006
Mr. Jim Berry might be well advised to devote some time to actually researching the validity of his over-simplified statements before posting them online. When someone writes something that is so factually untruthful, they run the risk of appearing ignorant and/or misinformed.

In other news, I have just discovered that in a time when most governments (especially in the U.S. and Europe) are trying to encourage energy diversification away from fossil fuels, the Canadian province of Alberta has begun subsidizing the cost of natural gas for residents of that province! See the link below.

http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/2853.asp?
Comment 10 of 12
No image available
May 24, 2006
It seems that the basic problem lies deep inside the structure of the energy sector, traditionally hiding the real energy costs (including the "externalities", subsidies of very different kinds, finance assymmetries, etc.). The way off requires to recognize and to ACCOUNT all the essential factors, crossed by its real weights (importance, even in the long term) for the mankind; it's not a joke or a only-one-country problem.
Comment 11 of 12
No image available
May 26, 2006
I have to say that PV development is practical for Canada. The VMJ chip is designed to run at 1000 Suns and produce 100 watts of power. It is the size of a postage stamp and all it needs is a good concentrator.

Just because Canada is further north does not mean it is out of the running if someone there can come up with a slightly larger tracking parabolic mirrors than the ones designed for geographical areas to the south.

Use of concentrated light saves silicon and should prove to be an economical way to produce energy for Canadians. Solar needs Canadian development.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 12 of 12
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
ACE European Group Standard Solar Inc. SkyFuel San Luis Valley Energy Fair Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Second Wind Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo