Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Canada to Slash Last Remaining Federal Solar Program

By Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
May 15, 2006   |   12 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"There's a slash and burn going on right now in Canada to eliminate anything that doesn't fit into the Conservative agenda. Just as we're starting to get going as an industry, firing on one cylinder, there was this change in the Federal Government."

-- Rob McMonagle, Canadian Solar Energy Industries Association, president
12 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 12
May 15, 2006
In Toronto our insolation beats Miami in july and august.we have better insolation than germany.can you tell we have a shill for the dinosaur juice business in power?
Comment
2 of 12
May 15, 2006
You don't need AZ sun to make solar work and work well...

.....Bill
Comment
3 of 12
May 15, 2006
I'm not familiar enough with Canadian politics.
Maybe Canada doesn't have the solar energy potential of
say, Arizona?
Comment
4 of 12
May 16, 2006
It is regretable that conservatives in the Canadian Parliament have dissociated themselves with the development of solar energy just at a time when some of the provinces have shown so much interest. I think it would be to the best interests of all Canadians that solar development be assisted.

Lack of social understanding of the importance of renewables is apparent or the Conservatives would never have disconnected funding in this manner. The problem may be in establishing priorities at the cabinet leve of government. I think that renewables should be at the top of the list but apparently, this is not so in the thinking of the conservatives.

I believe that all forms of renewables should be provided with some degree of government aid as renewables replace fossil fuels.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment
5 of 12
May 16, 2006
You don't need AZ sun to make solar work and work well..
If that's so, then why does the solar industry of Canada need corporate welfare ? If solar in Canada can't stand on its own feet economically,
then it's not worth pursuing.
Comment
6 of 12
May 17, 2006
The Conservatives were right to shut down the solar program. In many places, Solar is unreliable (clouds, rain, winter) and expensives compared to its peers. It often turns into just another government welfare/jobs program.

Why waste money on over priced solar, when the same money will do more good with Wind for less money?

On a dollar cost ratio, Wind in Canada is more effecient and costs less than Solar on an annual basis for what has been produced. Canada should not buy a single Solar cell until all of the cheaper Wind power is tapped.

The Conservative's energy program is the most effecient way to help the enviroment and the pocket book. That's why the Liberals are so confused.
Comment
7 of 12
May 17, 2006
It would be very interesting to me to see if the renewable energy industry could "stand on it's own feet" in Canada and the USA if it received proportionally the same level of "corporate wellfare" "subsidies and support" that the "dinosaur juice" industry receives. In Canada right now and in Alaska, the federal and provincial/state governments are looking at providing hundreds of Millions of dollars in grants and Subsidies to promote pipelines to permit oil/natural gas from Alaska and Northern Canada to be shipped down to the lower 48 states.
Comment
8 of 12
May 17, 2006
As a Canadian, am I disappointed that we aren't making great strides with solar? Of course, but solar just isn't as viable in Canada as it is in the southwest, and we still get a greater percentage of our energy from renewable sources such as hydro and tidal than the US does. With that said, you can never be too environmentally conscious, and I would really like to see Mr. Harper put more thought into our ecological future, if not in solar, than in something else.
Comment
9 of 12
May 17, 2006
Ontario now has a solar feed-in tariff equal to any in Europe..And solar efficiency goes DOWN if pv materials overheat..This is why Ont. (and other provs) should be taking a lead in PV instead of having to infight fed politicos - is it any wonder considering the intellectual level of these so-called public servants!?

On the other hand, they are in dismantling mode right now concerning everything former gov connected, but that is no excuse for blind ostrichism and BE A GOOD CONSERVATIVE KEEP THE MONEY & JOBS FLOWING; KYOTO BE DA***D, CAUSE THAT WAS THE OTHER GUYS!
Comment
10 of 12
May 18, 2006
Mr. Jim Berry might be well advised to devote some time to actually researching the validity of his over-simplified statements before posting them online. When someone writes something that is so factually untruthful, they run the risk of appearing ignorant and/or misinformed.

In other news, I have just discovered that in a time when most governments (especially in the U.S. and Europe) are trying to encourage energy diversification away from fossil fuels, the Canadian province of Alberta has begun subsidizing the cost of natural gas for residents of that province! See the link below.

http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/2853.asp?
Comment
11 of 12
May 24, 2006
It seems that the basic problem lies deep inside the structure of the energy sector, traditionally hiding the real energy costs (including the "externalities", subsidies of very different kinds, finance assymmetries, etc.). The way off requires to recognize and to ACCOUNT all the essential factors, crossed by its real weights (importance, even in the long term) for the mankind; it's not a joke or a only-one-country problem.
Comment
12 of 12
May 26, 2006
I have to say that PV development is practical for Canada. The VMJ chip is designed to run at 1000 Suns and produce 100 watts of power. It is the size of a postage stamp and all it needs is a good concentrator.

Just because Canada is further north does not mean it is out of the running if someone there can come up with a slightly larger tracking parabolic mirrors than the ones designed for geographical areas to the south.

Use of concentrated light saves silicon and should prove to be an economical way to produce energy for Canadians. Solar needs Canadian development.

adrianakau@aol.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Idaho Department of Commerce SkyFuel KACO new energy, Inc. Enphase Energy BBI International Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Rotork plc
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters