Photo Credit: David Suzuki Foundation
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
March 21, 2006

Ontario Renewable Energy Policy Breakthrough Hailed

by Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Ontario, Canada [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

The Ontario government today unveiled a vast, new renewable energy incentive program experts predict will accelerate the use of renewable energy in the province and create a regional market with implications for the global renewable energy industries. The plan is based on a long-term Standard Offer Contract, or feed-in-laws, as they are commonly called in Europe. It's essentially the same landmark policy platform that has made European countries like Germany and Spain beacons for renewable energy use.

"This is the most progressive renewable energy policy in North America in over two decades."

-- Paul Gipe, Renewable Energy Consultant

Ontario's Standard Offer program will offer $0.11/kWh (kilowatt-hour) to producers of wind, biomass and small hydro energy. It will offer $0.42/kWh for solar photovoltaic energy. The term of the contracts will be 20 years, and there will be an inflation adjustment. The residential retail price for electricity in Ontario is under $0.06/kWh (all figures in Canadian currency).

There is no limit to the number of projects that may apply for a contract, but the size of each project is capped at 10 MW. For comparison, the proposed Duke Point power plant on Vancouver Island (a medium-sized gas-fired power plant) would have been 260 MW in size. Ten MW of capacity is approximately sufficient to serve 10,000 homes.

The contracts are available to anyone, including homeowners, businesses and commercial energy producers. The electricity produced would be fed into the electricity grid. The contracts are expected to be available by June 2006. Many details for the implementation of the Standard Offer program will be worked out by the Ontario Power Authority and the Ontario Electricity Board.

In British Columbia and other North American jurisdictions, electricity contracts are awarded by requests for tender, with the lowest cost bids winning. The Standard Offer Contract, known in Europe as a "feed-law" or "advanced renewable tariff," offers renewable energy producers guaranteed access to the electricity grid at a price set by the regulatory authority. This gives producers the contractual certainty needed to finance renewable energy projects.

Janet Sawin, a renewable energy expert with the WorldWatch Institute hailed this as a policy that will echo the European successes and possibly help fuel a policy tipping point where this approach becomes more common in North America.

"This move could put Ontario on track to achieve success with renewables similar to that of world leaders like Germany and Spain," Sawin said. "Ontario's new policy could well become the model for North America to follow."

So far, in the U.S., there's a small pilot program in California based on this approach, also called a performance-based approach. The State of Washington recently passed a modest version based on this policy structure for small solar projects. And it's likely that California's new solar rebate plan will follow suit.

None, however, compare to the European embrace of such policies.

In Germany, adoption of the new policy has led to the development of 110,000 solar PV systems, 2,000 biomass plants, 6,000 small hydro plants, 16,500 wind turbines, and 45,000 jobs in the wind industry.

Renewable Energy Consultant Paul Gipe says the incentives for solar in this new plan are roughly half what the German incentives pay but are still more than California's new long-term rebate plan and the U.S. federal government's tax credit combined. And, he added, the solar resources in Ontario are in fact better than they are in Germany. But it's hardly just about solar, all the major renewable energy technologies will stand to benefit strongly from this policy.

"This is the most progressive renewable energy policy in North America in over two decades," Gipe said. "There's tremendous pent-up demand for wind, solar, biomass, and I would say there's a lot of small hydro potential that remains untapped up here. The proponents of renewable energy have been trying to find a mechanism that would unleash this. That's why we began this process two years ago."

These feed-in policies have come to be thought of as a primarily European policy approach but in fact they were first implemented in the U.S. Gipe says a similar policy enacted in the 1980s in California was responsible for massive amounts of wind power development, with almost 1000 MW being installed between 1984 and 1985 in the state. In the intervening decades, there was an ideological switch away from this method of supporting renewable energy in the U.S., he says. The Europeans more recently embraced the approach and have since provided the model to be lived up to.

"Europe has used this with great success," Gipe said. "But it can be used here and it will work here. And Ontario's government deserves credit for having made a strong value judgment; they made a decision on what's important to them. They have put public health at the top of their priorities and development of renewable energy follows that."

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty made the announcement at Photowatt Technologies in Cambridge, joined by Ontario's Minister of Energy Donna Cansfield and world-renowned scientist Dr. David Suzuki.

"Ontarians need a reliable power system that doesn't leave a legacy of economic or environmental debt," said Suzuki. "Today's announcement will revolutionize the market for clean, renewable energy in North America and lay the groundwork for a healthier, brighter future."
Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
March 21, 2006
For a modern, "progressive" country, we sure are behind. If long-term Standard Offer Contract, or feed-in-laws work in Europe to lock-in and safeguard energy income for investors, should not the US follow suit? We have an administration that moves about as slow as thick molasses when it comes to implementing progressive renewable business legislation.

We may have declared independence in 1776 but there is little reason not to accept old world thinking, especially when it has been successful in Germany and Spain. Does anyone have anything better to offer?

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
March 22, 2006
Well done Ontario in your very progressive move - How about considering Solar Thermal, where the homeowner will get a faster return on their investment with a Solar Thermal heating systems for hot water and Central heating than from a PV system. Have a look at what Europe is doing to promote Solar Thermal mainly in Germany and Spain by legislation. I encourage you to look at www.estif.org for more ideas.
Comment 2 of 13
No image available
March 22, 2006
All I have to say about this news is "Wooo Hooo!" and about time. I've been sending emails to the powers that be, asking them when and why they hadn't implemented SOC's and rebates since I first heard of such things. Finally! Good going.
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
March 22, 2006
This is absolutely GREAT! Finally my Premier has done something that will ensure that I vote for him again. I am very happy because now people will be serious about solar and wind. This should have happened 5 years ago. Every square inch of my roof will be silicon now! I expect to sell many grid tied photovoltaic power systems now. I Love David Suzuki! He is Just awesome.

solarenergy@rogers.com
Comment 4 of 13
No image available
March 23, 2006
We have 50 acres (farm) available in Ada, Michigan for a feed in program at this very moment. We have been on this land for 44 years. We would like to see wind and solar installations implemented on our farm,now, instead of when we are deceased. A guaranteed acceptance program for alternative energy such as Ontario will have, might provide us with that opportunity.
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
March 23, 2006
I would like to see the Michigan Dept. of Energy adopt a feed in program for renewable energy. This would give individuals, businesses, agriculture, and anyone who is interested in promoting alternative energy an opportunity to have an income by producing energy. In essence, each person could become an energy producing power plant with size depending on their intiative.
Comment 6 of 13
No image available
March 26, 2006
Finally, after Canada signed the Kyoto Accord years ago and did nothing to improved global warming, a Provincial Government has awakened to the need to stop the world's lowlands from being flooded and torn apart by extreme weather. I am forwarding this report to the Premiere of BC and asking him to get moving now.
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
March 27, 2006
This article raises some questions:

as I read the article the state will buy the wind electricity at a fixed price, is this correct? This is different in Germany. There the ultilities are obliged to buy the electricity for a fixed price. This way the support for renewables is not payed from tax money. Instaed the utilites raise their electricity with less than half a eurocent. This way the polluter pays.


Secondly, in Germany the height of the fixed tarriff depends on the year a project is build. A wind turbine built in 2007 will receive a lower kWh-price as a project build now. This anticipates and pushes technology improvement. From the article it is unclear if the Ontoria policy has a same mechanism.

More information would be welcome.
Comment 8 of 13
No image available
March 27, 2006
I hope the BC government will follow Ontario's lead. BCHydro has a wide open opportunity here to manage its profit margins and consumption strains.
This is fantastic news! Now Canada needs to phase out nuclear energy and build on the renewable sector and set a good example to our neighbours.
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
March 28, 2006
It is my understanding that this Standard Offer Contract [SOC] has a lower limit of 500 KW. This leaves the home owner in the dark. Many countries have incentives for individuals to install their own RE system. As great as this SOC is, Ontario still needs incentives for the little guys. Will the SOC create co-ops to generate more power or are Ontario citizens too conservative?
Great step forward but do not drag the other foot behind.
Comment 10 of 13
No image available
March 29, 2006
As well, peak demand for electricity is on hot summer days from 3pm-5pm which is when air conditioning is at it's peak level of use and commercial, industrial, and residential customers are all using electricity at the same time.

So when does solar PV produce the most electricity on average? On bright sunny summer days, when the sun is still fairly high in the sky but it's starting to cool off, which increases the efficiency of the solar cells ie. the late afternoon. It's no coincidence that they're pushing PV with nearly 4x the subsidized rate of other RE technologies...it's reliable (nearly maintenance free) and above all PREDICTABLE).
Comment 11 of 13
No image available
March 29, 2006
I'm thrilled that Ontario is taking the lead in supporting RE! The comments about the strong moral fiber of Premier McGuinty are off the mark though...Ontario is in an extremely compromised position because they haven't made needed investments in electricity generation capacity over the past decade. Currently, Ontario can't even cover peak demand and must purchase electricity from the U.S. when required (remember the 2003 blackout?).
Demand for electricity in Ontario is also projected to grow faster than generation capacity can be built and Ontario will have inadequate supply within a few years. The renewables incentive just happens to be the quickest, cheapest method for Ontario to maintain supply of electricity, plus they enjoy the advantage of distributing risk and offloading maintenance costs. This program would not exist unless they had a serious need for it...and they do. (That's why they don't include solar thermal though it's much more efficient. They need *electricity*)
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
March 29, 2006
This SOC shows great initiative on the part of the Ontario Liberal Government. It is a giant step in the right direction, and, hopefully, still only the first step.
The benefits extend way beyond the promotion of healthy renewable energy. It will encourage the development of an industry with immense potential for research, employment, and income from many new sources now and in the future.

The prestige of this great province is now enhanced around the world, and it makes me proud to actively participate in the use of renewable - and clean - energy.

Congratulations to Mr. McGuinty and his team for a great forward looking initiative.

Claude Courtemanche
Durham, Ontario
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Canadian Solar Inc. SMA America, LLC Prism Solar Technologies, Inc Global Marine Renewable Energy Conference Schüco Krannich Solar Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo