Photo Credit: Jesse Broehl
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (9) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
January 12, 2006

California Passes Long-Term Solar Energy Plan

by Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
San Francisco, California [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

On Thursday, California regulators approved the California Solar Initiative (CSI), the largest solar energy policy ever enacted in the U.S. and second only to Germany in terms of global solar policy.

The CPUC will provide $2.8 billion in customer incentives for solar projects on existing residential buildings, as well as all public buildings, industrial facilities, businesses, and agricultural facilities. The California Energy Commission, meanwhile, will provide $400 million in incentives for new homes, specifically targeting collaborations with the builder / developer community.

The California Public Utilities Commission passed the California Solar Initiative (CSI) by a vote of 3 to 1 with Commissioner Geoffrey Brown voting against it. Commissioner John Bohn recused himself, citing a conflict of interest with his investments in Chevron and General Motors.

The plan is both historic and monumental for the solar industry in the U.S. and beyond. It allots USD $3.2 billion for solar energy rebates in the state for the next 11 years, providing for the installation of approximately 3000 MW of solar energy, roughly the power equivalent of six large natural-gas fired power plants.

This moment also ends what has been a roller-coaster ride for solar advocates in California and beyond who have been waiting for the state to breathe new life into support for solar. The CSI plan effectively supplants two of the critical features that were present in the ill-fated "Million Solar Roofs Initiative" or SB 1, which faltered twice in the California legislature. It provides the long term rebate plan and the funds to back it up.

The CPUC will provide $2.8 billion in customer incentives for solar projects on existing residential buildings, as well as all public buildings, industrial facilities, businesses, and agricultural facilities. The California Energy Commission, meanwhile, will provide $400 million in incentives for new homes, specifically targeting collaborations with the builder / developer community.

Solar industry executives are already considering the possibilities for expansion (see related story at the jump below).

The CSI plan does not include a mandate that new homes in California include solar energy, nor does it include any licensing changes to who is eligible to install solar projects in the state. It also does not require that solar installation work be done as so-called "prevailing wages," essentially union wages. All three items exposed and exacerbated deep opposition between the majority of the solar industry and certain union interests that backed some of the proposals.

Despite some of this tension, public support for the plan was repeatedly mentioned as a critical factor in bringing this plan to the CPUC. Over the last three months, 50,000 people have written to the California Public Utilities Commissioners to ask them to pass a long-term solar rebate program - more public comment than the CPUC has received on any issue they have ever considered, including the 2001 energy crisis.

Rebates beginning this year will stay at the $2.80 per watt mark and will gradually decline for the following ten years. By design, the rebates will decline by 10 percent per year through the duration of the program. The money will come from existing funds already earmarked for solar power and a very small additional surcharge on monthly electric bills over eleven years.

The PUC rebates may also move from a capacity-based approach to a performance-based approach or some variation of the two. Details will be finalized over the coming months through stakeholder workshops.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (9)
 
No image available
January 13, 2006
This is a solid plan that will benefit the solar PV industry at all levels. Welcome to the future.
Comment 1 of 9
January 13, 2006
Don't be surprised if it is for solar electric only. You have to look at what is driving the whole PV market in this country. Not only is it probably for solar electric only, but I wouldn't be surprised if it has to be grid tied. The power companies are smiling all the way to the bank!!!!

.....Bill
Comment 2 of 9
No image available
January 13, 2006
Hello
This is good,Now maybe the cost for equipment will become cheaper over time.
Comment 3 of 9
No image available
January 13, 2006
Do I take it correctly that the rebates are for solar electric only? (That would be unfortunately short sighted.)
Comment 4 of 9
No image available
January 13, 2006
Kudos,job well done
Comment 5 of 9
No image available
January 18, 2006
How can I take advantage of this new rebate program? I want to install a solar panel system on my commercial warehouse building in the SW side of sunny Portrero Hill in San Francisco.

According to the sharpusa.com website, the state of California already offers a rebate of $3.20/watt and a tax credit of 7.5%. Will the CSI rebate represent an additional savings of $2.80/watt?

If so, the total watt savings ($3.20+2.80) will be $6/watt, $.50 better than New Jersey's $5.50/watt rebate, and a clear incentive for fence-sitters to take the plunge.

If not, the CSI represents a step backwards.

$20,000 for a typical 3500 watt solar panel system, after rebates and tax credit, is attractive only if the investment can be shown to significantly reduce conventional energy costs over the systems' 25 year life expectancy. Are there testimonials from current system owners in my area available for perusal? Also, will CSI be offering attractive financing for new installations?
Comment 6 of 9
No image available
January 19, 2006
I think it is short-sightedness not to allow commercial buildings to be a part of the rebate. Have they also studies availability of Solar cells, considering the fact that silicon still continues to be in shortage.
Comment 7 of 9
No image available
January 19, 2006
Reply to John Zane,

A lot of questions in there John. To the big one, no, the new rebate level is not $2.80 / watt, plus an older rebate level of $3.20 / watt. It looks like Sharp is a little slow on updating their Web site. If you believe that $2.80 per watt is a step backwards then I guess, yes, in a way it is. But...it's also the first time California, and any other state for that matter, has had a long term program like this. And everyone has anticipated the level going there. That's very much not a step backwards for all stakeholders, and more than most people can ask for in many states accross the U.S. Coupled with the Federal tax credit, it's still the time to take the plunge. - jesse
Comment 8 of 9
No image available
Anonymous
October 3, 2009
This is a solid plan that will benefit the solar PV industry at all levels. Welcome to the future.
===============================
Ethan
Comment 9 of 9
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Solar Living Institute Sonobond Ultrasonics SolarCraft SunWize Technologies Renewable Energy World Europe Solar Electric Power Association
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo