Photo Credit: Stirling Energy Systems
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (8) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 10, 2005

World's Largest Solar Project Unveiled

Rosemead, California [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

For the past few weeks, solar industry insiders have been whispering of a massive multi-MW solar thermal power project slated for the desert Southwest that would be the first commercial application of dish-style solar thermal stirling energy units from Stirling Energy Systems (SES). It's a secret no more.

"The contract requires no state subsidy and provides favorable pricing for ratepayers because tests have shown the Stirling dish technology can produce electricity at significantly lower costs than other solar technologies."

-Alan Fohrer, SCE chief executive officer

If all goes according to plan, a partnership between SES and Southern California Edison (SCE), would see the construction of an expansive 4,500-acre solar generating station in Southern California. When completed, the proposed power station would be the world's largest solar facility, capable of producing more electricity than all other U.S. solar projects combined.

The 20-year power purchase agreement signed today, which is subject to California Public Utilities Commission approval, calls for development of a 500-MW solar project 70 miles northeast of Los Angeles using innovative Stirling dish technology. The agreement includes an option to expand the project to 850 MW. Initially, Stirling would build a one-MW test facility using 40 of the company's 37-foot-diameter dish assemblies. Subsequently, a 20,000-dish array would be constructed near Victorville, Calif., during a four-year period.

"At a time of rising fossil-fuel costs and increased concern about greenhouse-gas emissions, the Stirling project would provide enough clean power to serve 278,000 homes for an entire year," said SCE Chairman John Bryson. "Edison is committed to facilitating development of new, environmentally sensitive, renewable energy technologies to meet the growing demand for electricity here and throughout the U.S."

Although Stirling dish technology has been successfully tested for 20 years, the SCE-Stirling project represents its first major application in the commercial electricity generation field. Experimental models of the Stirling dish technology have undergone more than 26,000 hours of successful solar operation. A six-dish model Stirling power project is currently operating at the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

"We are especially pleased about the financial benefits of this agreement for our customers and the state," said Alan Fohrer, SCE chief executive officer. "The contract requires no state subsidy and provides favorable pricing for ratepayers because tests have shown the Stirling dish technology can produce electricity at significantly lower costs than other solar technologies."

The Stirling dish technology converts thermal energy to electricity by using a mirror array to focus the sun's rays on the receiver end of a Stirling engine. The internal side of the receiver then heats hydrogen gas which expands. The pressure created by the expanding gas drives a piston, crank shaft, and drive shaft assembly much like those found in internal combustion engines but without igniting the gas. The drive shaft turns a small electricity generator. The entire energy conversion process takes place within a canister the size of an oil barrel. The
process requires no water and the engine is emission-free.

Tests conducted by SCE and the Sandia National Laboratories have shown that the Stirling dish technology is almost twice as efficient as other solar technologies. These include parabolic troughs which use the sun's heat to create steam that drives turbines similar to those found in conventional power plants, and photovoltaic cells that rely on an expensive and increasingly limited raw material stock.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (8)
 
No image available
August 10, 2005
Hello Graham,

you're right and the simplest correct formaulation should be "would provide enough clean power to serve 278,000 ON AVERAGE", because neither the plant's output nor the home's demand are constant.

Overall, this project is very great news for solar energy. however, curiously, PV pannels still get more rooms in mainstream medias with 500 kW projets and kWh at 20 cents than thermodynamic solar.

Seems strange to use thousands of dish-stirlings inbstead of large throughs or central collectors for a project that large (500MW, 50% more than mojave!).

With this project, dish-stirling will be mass-produced, what will shrink their price. This will open the way for smaller projects, perharps as small as one dish - one or two 25 kw generators could be nice for an hotel, an hospital, or a small business.

Sadly, the article let us without two vital informations : price (both capital expense, and cost of electricity) and deadline (when will the project be online?).
Comment 1 of 8
No image available
August 10, 2005
Keen.

How about that "would provide enough clean power to serve 278,000 homes for an entire year". The last four words would mean nothing at all, if by "power" the suit meant power. If he meant energy, then two energies are being compared and found equal: that which might be demanded by "278,000 homes" in a year, and that which the plant, if built, would provide over an unspecified interval.The most reasonable guess for that interval would be its lifetime, but that wouldn't be anything to boast about, even hypothetically.

Next most reasonable guess is a year; but then he could have just said the plant would support 278,000 households' demand.


--- Graham Cowan, former hydrogen fan
boron as energy carrier: real-car range, nuclear cachet
Comment 2 of 8
No image available
August 11, 2005
A few additionnal informations

- Construction will be in the 2008-2011 timeframe (SCE site)

- SCe won't have to wait until 2011 to get some "juice" : electricity will be injected into the grid as soon as the first dish is built. This is a positive result of the modular conception.

- This modular conception is also nice for reliability. Some dishes can be outline, this don't affect the other ones.

- Unfortunately, SES says it's now targetting only utility market so nobody can buy one or two dishes "for at least two years".

- They promise a cost of electricity of 0.06$/kWh for large projects. If they manage to do that, this is competitive : roughly the same price than wind power, but production occurs at daytime (more valuable electricity) and is quite reliable (in a desert, wheather is quite predictable)

- Land occupied by suuch a "solar farm" is tiny compared to what is submerged by a hydroelectric plant of similar capacity.
Comment 3 of 8
No image available
This is excellent news!

But, together with Cyril Meynier, I would like to know more details.
What is the kWh price SCE is going to pay SES?
How does this price relate to the 12 $cents/kWh SCE is paying Florida Power and Light for the electricity from the SEGS IX station?

But, anyway, a major step forward is made towards the solar economy of the future.

Evert du Marchie van Voorthuysen
Groningen, The Netherlands
Comment 4 of 8
No image available
August 12, 2005
I saw almost the exact copy of these units in 1985 at the RETSIE conference in LA. They were then units made by McDonnel/Douglas. It took twenty years. Wow!
Comment 5 of 8
No image available
August 12, 2005
What is the cost per KW, or MW for the original installation?

I am trying to compare this fascinating concept to a seemingly foolhardy plan nto try and get a coal gasification plant and CO2 sequestration plant into a fuel cell power plant fired with coal/gas. It is estimated to cost of the fuel cell alone is $400 per KW installed, and no estimate published of the ongoing cost of the electricity produced.
Comment 6 of 8
No image available
August 14, 2005
4500 acreas is about 7 square miles of potentially expensive real estate. We should be experimenting with these concepts in abandoned industrial plant areas. Bethlehem Steel, for example, has defunct plants of that size. The auto industry should have many qualifiers. Instead of being an eyesore for 500 years, perhaps we can recycle these facilities using some of the existing infrastructure. As the US continues its industrial decline we should be considering ways of reusing consumed assets and real estate.. ROIs may be better and the environmental apsects will be positive.
Comment 7 of 8
No image available
September 7, 2005
-- Rich Barbarics, August 14, 2005
"4500 acreas is about 7 square miles of potentially expensive real estate. We should be experimenting with these concepts in abandoned industrial plant areas."
Not to discount your sugestion, but even in California, desert real estate is not all that expensive. It also is the best kind of a place to build a solar farm with over 5 hours of peak sunshine per day. The plant is also near the biggest metrapolatain area in America (LA and surrounding areas), so it seems like in this case they got the an ideal piece of estate for a good deal. That said, I still think your general idea was a good one.
Comment 8 of 8
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Poet SolarTech Consortium Renewable Energy World Asia Green Energy Promotions HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. PVPowered Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo