Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: NREL
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (11) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
February 14, 2005

Solar Silicon Market a Seller's Paradise

Worldwide Industry Demand Outpacing Silicon Production
by Lara Skinner, News Reporter, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Peterborough, New Hampshire [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Production demand and raw material supply are giving photovoltaic manufacturers a rough lesson in economics. For the past few years the solar industry has faced a tight market for silicon feedstock because of a renewed demand for silicon from the semiconductor and computer chip industry. Silicon is the raw material used for photovoltaic (PV) cells and modules.

"There's a new phenomenon happening in the solar industry. The new players are growing into a different type of industry."

- Thomas Zarrella, President GT Solar

"The solar industry has grown to the point that the silicon demand is exceeding the supply," said Thomas Zarrella. Zarrella is the president of GT Solar in New Hampshire, which produces fabrication lines and manufacturing equipment for the PV industry.

The solar industry has relied mostly on the "tops and tails" of the semiconductor industry since PV manufacturing moved out of the government laboratories and into the commercial market. Tops and tails refers to ends and sides of a silicon ingot, which are cut off after production because they contain more impurities than the center of the ingot.

When the semiconductor industry slowed in the late 1990s, the silicon producers needed to sell their available inventory of feedstock. The solar industry was growing and was there to fill the gap in sales. But when the semiconductor industry began to pick-up again silicon producers honored their previous contracts over the demand of the PV industry, which was continuing to develop.

"We've grown to a point where we're something like 40 percent of the silicon market," said Rhone Resch, who is the president of the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA).

The solar industry's growth is so pronounced that SEIA created the Crystalline Silicon Initiative, which is a lobbying effort for increased government funding toward silicon research. Reducing materials use and increasing PV cell efficiency would have a direct effect on manufacturers because silicon is one-third of the cost of cell production, Resch said.

Exacerbating the situation is the fact that Solar Grade Silicon (SGS) of Washington State is the only company in the world that is dedicated to producing silicon specifically for the solar industry. Company President Tor Hartmann said major silicon producers Wacker in Germany, Tokuyama in Japan and Hemlock in the U.S. have strong ties to the semiconductor industry, though they have dedicated a portion of their output to the PV industry.

Hartmann said the market should continue to be tight through 2006 because of growth in both the PV and semiconductor industry.

Long-term contracts from companies in the solar industry would make it easier for SGS to expand production and meet the silicon demand, according to Hartmann, because contracts can help him secure investment capital for facility improvements. SGS is considering increasing silicon production from 2,100 tons a year to 3,000, and it would be the first expansion the company has experienced in a few years, he said.

The most recent numbers available for total PV silicon production worldwide are 6,000 tons in 2003, from an IEA report on the agency's Photovoltaic Power Systems Program. Europe and the U.S. led the market then, but the demand for module production in the U.S. has outstripped the silicon availability all of the way down the supply line, according to the President of GT Technologies Thomas Zarrella. High demand allows the supplier to ask a premium price, he said, but there are some market changes in the works.

"There's a new phenomenon happening in the solar industry. The new players are growing into a different type of industry," he said.

Larger companies, such as British Petroleum (BP) and General Electric (GE), are entering the silicon market specifically for solar applications.

Being a large company doesn't ensure an easy entrance into the market. BP Spokeswoman Sarah Howell said silicon prices have almost doubled since 2002, and the solar industry expects to see pricing pressure from silicon manufacturers until production expansions match the PV industry requirements.

"We are looking at many ways to mitigate this pricing increase, including increasing the yield of silicon in the manufacturing process as well as reducing wafer thickness," Howell said. "BP Solar is also collaborating with R and D departments from major companies and other partners to develop less expensive silicon sources."

Thinner silicon wafers means a reduction in the amount of materials used and could, in turn, drive technology improvements for silicon production. Zarrella said that some companies are working on purifying the silicon used in the steel industry for PV. Other PV cell manufacturers are trying to use more of the silicon ingots by slicing off less of the tops and tails.

However, until those approaches are improved, the semiconductor market will determine how the solar silicon market operates, according to Zarrella, and supply will feel like a beg, borrow or steal market.
Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (11)
 
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
Silicon isn't a good material for concentrators because the cell isn't efficient enough. When you need to push 40% efficiencies (which is what you need in a concentrator) you have to use tandem 3 (or even more) layer gallium arsenide compounds. At 400+ sun concentrations the cost of the PV material isn't very high compared with the cost of the frames, mirrors, two axis steering systems and water cooling devices to prevent the PV from being vaporised.
Comment 1 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
Although national leaders may or may not now realize this, adequate alternative energy production, including massively increased supplies of PV cells, are now a critical, urgent part of our national security. The time is now well past for this problem to be left solely to the whims of the marketplace. Devising cost-effective means of non-nuclear alternative energy production must now become a sub- function of our state and national governments, indispensable for our national defense.
Comment 2 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
This should not be a surprise to the PV industry. Several papers over the past 5 years have warned of a coming shortage. The issue of supply was extensively covered at the 13th NREL Workshop on Crystalline Si Cells on August 10-13, 2003. See the paper "PV Feedstock Costs--Five Year Outlook" by J. Maurits. More detail on the polysilicon processes was given at the 2003 ISES Conference in Goteborg, Sweden in the paper "Availability of Solar Grade Silicon-A Critical Issue for the Further Growth of the PV Industry" by A. Bjorseth and B. Ceccoroli. That projected shortage is upon us and will continue to affect price and delivery. Using higher purity feedstock increases cell efficiency, thus reducing the effective cost. It is estimated that a 1% improvement in cell efficiency translates to a savings of $10/kg in feedstock costs. Crystal growers can also reduce feedstock costs by improving crucible packing density, reloading of crucibles, and moving to bulk packaging.
Comment 3 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
The PV industry is overlooking solar concentrators as an obvious approach for alleviating the silicon supply problem. Silicon solar cell technology has now been developed and proven effective at solar intensities of 1000 or more suns with output power exceeding 200,000 watts per square meter (www.photovolt.net). High intensity PV concentrators will not only enable significantly lower $/watt systems but will effectively alter the economics in solar cells: The silicon needed for 1 MW of today’s solar cell modules could provide a 1000 MW of high intensity PV concentrators with just a few pennies per watt in prime-grade silicon material cost. Why should the PV industry rely on a limited supply of relatively expensive scrap-grade silicon when there is virtually an unlimited supply of glass mirrors available at less than $20/m2?
Comment 4 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 17, 2005
Silicon production with Centralized PV Facilities may or may not have solvable issues. But Power Line transportation impact on delivery from Centralized Generation sites pushes total cost of delivered the electric energy to the user.

With an aging infrastructure failing at current delivery loads, Distributed (not Centralized) Generating capability is critical to National Security concerns AND providing Clean Renewable Electricity.

Or else we (or the Republican plans) will Fund, with a blank check for customer billable dollars, having the electric company rebuild it's infrastructure with rate increases.

But, please avoid proposing Hydrogen as a fuel alternative until after calculating the number of MEGAWATTS of Electricity needed per 100 cars or fuel cells supplied to create distributed (or centralized) Hydrogen. Then go calculate the Global Warming Impact.

Clean, Renewable Energy is most often defined as Solar, Wave or Wind for a good (non-political) reason.
Comment 5 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 18, 2005
The cost of III-V cells can triple 500-sun concentrator costs.
Silicon doubles cost when factoring in performance. Cost reduction of III-V is vital.
Comment 6 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
I perfectly happy contributing to increased PV demand and install them on schools. Building infrastructure for a priceless future.

eCouncil is a non-profit 501(c)3 Corporation
Comment 7 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
February 21, 2005
It is well argued that the whole world is under threat of pollution and unfriendly environmenatal cosequences coming from our excessive consumption of diesel-generated energy. The right time has come to the nations to reach consensus on preserving our god-giving environment, and protection of environment should not be responsibility of only governments, but also responsibility of every single individual that lives on the earth.
Comment 8 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
April 18, 2005
As there is a huge demand of silicon in the solar industry, at what price can silicon wafers be sold? Is the price 60USD/kg right?
Comment 9 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
May 7, 2005
why is silicon used mostly in fabrication of solar cell
Comment 10 of 11
No image available
September 15, 2005
I agree with Hassan Jama; we can bitch about what the government should be doing, but it won't make them listen to us. It is up to us to use renewable energy and promote the use of renewable energy to people who want to do their part to help the environment or just want to save money. If you have the right devote your life to trying to get the government to change it's policy on renewables, you have the oblagation to use them yourself and promote their use to the public as well.
Comment 11 of 11
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Spire Corporation Solar Energy International Virtual Renewable Energy Pavilion at the Virtual Energy Forum Focus Solar SkyFuel All Energy
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo