Photo Credit: WWF
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (30) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
February 9, 2005

Ethanol Research Breakthrough: Wood Feedstock

Brockport, New York [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Corn is the usual feedstock for producing ethanol in the U.S, but wood could open up the growing market to states outside of the Midwest. Researchers at the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF) say they have invented a method for removing energy-rich sugars from wood, a process that could help develop agricultural feedstocks for ethanol production, and increase profits for New York's and other states' pulp and paper industries.

"You can also extract these components from grasses, but grasses go dormant in the winter and they're difficult and expensive to store for use in a year-round process. And trees are dense. They can be shipped and stored economically, and they are more efficient energy collectors than annual crops. After the desired components are extracted, the residue can be burned or gasified for combined heat and power uses."

- Dr. Thomas E. Amidon

The process developed at ESF is the work of Dr. Thomas E. Amidon, chair of the college's Faculty of Paper Science and Engineering. It could help the economically significant pulp and paper industry develop more efficient and sustainable biorefineries.

"We know our sources of fossil fuel aren't going to last forever," Amidon said. "This will allow us to substitute a sustainable energy source: wood."

During the last few years, Amidon collaborated with students, ranging from a home-schooled high school student to ESF doctoral candidates, to devise a new and subtler method for separating wood into its basic components.

Chief among those components is cellulose, the polysaccharide (sugar) that is the single strongest, most widely used component of woody plants. In the context of a paper mill, cellulose becomes pulp for use in making paper. The second largest component of hardwood trees is the polysaccharide xylan, which is primarily dissolved in the pulping process.

The real value in that sugar, Amidon said, was never exploited. Once fermented, the sugar xylan can produce ethanol, which can be used in cars instead of, or in combination with, traditional gasoline.

Although the energy factor is the focus of attention now, there is a second benefit to the process as the nation steps up its development of alternative fuel sources. In addition to extracting sugar from the wood, scientists can separate out the wood's acetic acid, which is used primarily in manufacturing. A major use of acetic acid is the manufacturing of polyvinyl acetate, a plastic used in many aspects of home construction and many other consumer products. The commercial value of acetic acid is nearly three times that of ethanol: 45 cents per pound as opposed to 18 cents per pound.

One of the advantages to the process, according to Amidon, is that is does not use any harsh chemicals.

Ordinary wood chips are mixed with water and heated at high temperatures for a specified length of time. That time can be shortened if the chips are first subjected to biopulping, a process that allows natural wood-decaying fungi to munch through the lignin that binds the cellulose in the wood. That process is also the subject of research at ESF.

"Water is the solvent we use," Amidon said. "It's my preferred solvent because if it gets loose in the world it's just water and the world knows how to deal with it."

The watery solution that remains after the chips are removed is then forced through a membrane that separates the sugars from the water. The acetic acid is removed the same way.

"The trees are here and they can provide year-round employment," Amidon said. "You can also extract these components from grasses, but grasses go dormant in the winter and they're difficult and expensive to store for use in a year-round process. And trees are dense. They can be shipped and stored economically, and they are more efficient energy collectors than annual crops. After the desired components are extracted, the residue can be burned or gasified for combined heat and power uses."

The work, while still in the testing phase, has received support from International Paper, the world's largest paper company, and from Lyonsdale Biomass, a wood-fueled energy producer. Representatives of both companies stated in letters of support that they believe the process "has significant promise of increasing the profitability" of their operations. International Paper has indicated it is a willing partner in exploring technology transfer in the biorefinery work.

Lyonsdale has expressed interest in what the company calls "the potential positive impact" of the process on the company's ability to convert woody materials to energy.

In addition, the ESF team has demonstrated the process for scientists from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Colorado.

The process is a natural fit for states with northern hardwood forests, Amidon said, because the sugars in hardwood trees are simpler than those found in softwood trees.

And the process is not choosy about which hardwood trees it uses. Maples, common in the state's forests, work just fine, he said. But so do the willow biomass crops that are being developed by ESF researchers and their colleagues as a commercial crop for energy uses, such as at the Lyonsdale facility.

"If you consider the concept of removing sugars and acetic acid from willow biomass and then burning or gasifying what's left over from that process, the economics of growing willow as an energy crop are significantly improved," Amidon said.
Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (30)
 
No image available
Anonymous
February 9, 2005
Is deforestation really a good way to reduce US oil dependency? Traditional forestry techniques are not noted for their long term benefits in terms of biodiversity, land degredation, etc. If ethanol is produced much more efficiently from wood than corn (in terms of source material energy density and the cost of processing), then it sounds like a good idea to produce ethanol from wood. However, as mentioned in the article, that wood should come from biomass plantations, not from native forests.
Comment 1 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 10, 2005
Wood would not come from deforestatoin but rather from wood waste in industry AND waste from proper forest management by pruning forests for best growth. 99% of available wood waste is simply left to rot on the forest floor.
Comment 2 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 10, 2005
Etanol production from dead or damaged trees (forest fire or insect infested areas) would be a great improvement to forest health and a needed new revenue stream for forest landowners and timber harvesters. Any use of an "unused or wasted" renewable resource that would help lessen our dependence on a finite resource (oil or natural gas) would certainly be valuable to all concerned, and to the environment and the economy.
Comment 3 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 10, 2005
For a Swedish visitor at this site it is hard to comprehend this aversion to forestry and forestry products. New trees are planted and they grow back. In Sweden there is a new pilote plant for production of ethanol from forestry residues (in Ornskoldsvik). Contact Jan Lindstedt at www.baff.se for more information./Kjell Andersson, Svebio, Swedish Biomass Association (www.svebio.se).
Comment 4 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 11, 2005
I would be curious to know if they have considered black locust tree as a feedstock. Not only is it a nitrogen-fixing legume with an early growth habit faster than any other northern biomass crop tree, but it also contains appreciable amounts of ethanol as an extractive chemical (~5% dry matter). Fiber characteristics are also favorable. Planted like alfalfa in high densities it can be harvested twice per year as a very short rotation coppice crop, or thinned and allowed to coppice for standard SRC ie 2-5 years. Intercropping with other crops could reduce pressure on forestry reserves while maximizing per acre/year production.
Comment 5 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 11, 2005
Previous comments well taken. Current reforestation methods produce forests which are inferior to old growth forests. If society is willing to pay the additional costs involved in selective cutting rather than clear cutting, biomass plantations could be a good deal. Waste wood use, is, of course, a no-brainer. Bear in mind the CO2 emissions from ethanol use. If we shift fuel use to only those applications which MUST use liquid fuel (i.e. aviation) and shift autos and trains to electric, ethanol from wood could put us well on the way to sustainability.
Comment 6 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 12, 2005
In all of these "biomass" utilization technologies I find that the energy equation is always missing.
In other words, does energy out exceed total energy in?

Ihor
Comment 7 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 13, 2005
What's their aversion to methanol??
It seems that it is a little more votile
but hey so is octane, you know?
They're bringin obtuseness to new heights
Comment 8 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 13, 2005
The article says "Ordinary wood chips are mixed with water and heated at high temperatures for a specified length of time."

What is the overall net energy gain in the conversion process? If the energy input is per tree is a significant portion of the energy in the tree, it's probably a losing proposition. We probably don't want to chop down a tree just to get a percentage of the tree's energy in a desireable format and, in the process, expend a lot of lower quality energy and throw more smoke and heat into the atmosphere. Unfortunately, the article doesn't discuss this important factor.
Comment 9 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 14, 2005
Agreed with all of the above comments - I'm certainly not opposed to harnessing waste wood, or to using properly managed biomass plantations or forestry management projects. But as "guest user" mentioned above, re-forested areas are cleary inferior to natural forest areas - replanted by the least expensive bidder, they lack in species diversity, and all of the forest infrastructure that comes from the natural process of growth through succession. Additionally, most deforested areas suffer significant damage before they are replanted - nutrient leaching, soil loss, etc. Anyway, good comment from the other guest user on net energy gain from the process - that's what I was trying to ask, phrased a lot more poorly, in my original post...
Comment 10 of 30
No image available
February 15, 2005
To the person from the Swedish Biomass Association they should understand that North Americans are not as enlightend in terms siliviculture and reforestation as Scandinavians. If one takes the Train (Linx) from Oslo-Malmo, the logging seen is done in the ways that Canadians can heardly dream of. Also, Scandinavian forestry is execelent in the production of forest products and also in ensuring that the endangered species lists grow in a logarithmic fashion. I think we should only use biomass that is already waste rather than use more land in a periods were we are in what is called the 3rd great extinction. Lets look at wave energy and wind energy and leave the forests for better uses than for fuel production.

Hedo
Comment 11 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 15, 2005
Another example of PR for an untried concept. Academics marketing their pet project. Noted the "testing phase" escape term. A wood to ethanol breakthrough? Hello. Let's see the mass-energy balance. Wood-to-EtOH processes simply cannot compete with wood-to-paper and wood-to-other higher added value products. Wood (energy) plantations are non-starters. Wood wastes are left, unreliable sources for a 365/24/7 plant.
Comment 12 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 15, 2005
Why burn or breakdown the wood into fuel when it can be used as a carrier (like hydrogen) of energy from other sources like solar or geothermal as in:
www.EnergyWithoutOil.org
Comment 13 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
Ethanol from cellulous is happening now. One company in Canada, www.iogen.ca, just shipped ethanol from its pilot refinery to Shell, who mixed it into an E85 blend (85% ethanol/15% gasoline) and sent it to Germany. There, VW and Mercedes ran test cars and pronounced the results great. Iogen's process uses genetically engineered enzymes to digest the cellulouse from any source in a highly efficient process. Corn to ethanol has about a 1.2 energy return (1.2 back from 1 input). The Iogen process has about a 3 to 1 return and lower costs and disposal problems. Shell has bought 70% of the company and is moving forward. If hybrid cars reduced the gasoline consumption to 50% of current levels and they were fueled with E85 further reducing the crude oil import, where's the Oil Crisis? US and Canada is the Saudi Arabia of cellulous.
Comment 14 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
If you want to see an effective means of producing ethanol from wood waste, look at the following web site: www.brienergy.com
Comment 15 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
And how is the waste stream from this process handled? -- added to the general question: What is the energy balance?
www.CorpFutRes.com
Comment 16 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 16, 2005
It's about time we start thinking more about ethanol. I don't believe the article was about deforestization - more in the terms of using what is already being discarded anyways - when all the oil is gone, I hope you tree huggers hold on tight because that tree is going to have to heat your house, drive your car, and light your house in the future, there is little doubt in that. Ethanol is becoming more efficient in terms of the energy to energy ratio everyday and if hydrogen is your answer, that may be true 10 years from now. Ethanol is now so lets get that perfected first.
Comment 17 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
The naysayers need to understand that this is a fractionalization technology which separates and recovers a value-added product pre-process as opposed to a post-process waste recovery ie black liquor methanol. Wood sugar/alcohol would merely be wasted if this technology wasn't used prior to the pulping or biomass combustion processes. Paper-making is a net energy sink thus energy balance is irrelevant while biomass energy is typically limited to low-value bulk BTU which the higher quality mobile ethanol biofuel increases.

This is similiar to fractionating sugar cane into juice for non-ruminant feed and the bagasse for ruminant feed, or alfalfa into high-protein leafmeal for animal feed and high-fiber stem for biofuel.
Comment 18 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
Tembec has a small sulfite pulp mill in Temiskaming Quebec that has produced 18 million litres of 95% ethanol from primary pulp sludge for a great many years.

see : http://www.tembec.ca/DynamicPortal?key=web&lng=en-US&crit=products_chemical_ethanol&page=tpl_products

ihor43us, February 12, 2005 - on using black locust as a nitrogen fixative has some merit when it comes to establing/improving stands of more desirable tree species. Speckled Alder aluns rugosa is another small shrub with nitrogen ffixative feature and grows naturally much futher north.
Comment 19 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
Dear Mr Kjell Andersson
I could not find any information regarding what you mentioned in top(second comment which you wrote).I searched the site ,but it seems that your purpose was to introduce the company which you wanted to advertise for it.Please send me an emai and let me know of a new pilot plant for production of ethanol.
Best wishes
ali from Yazd University in Iran
Comment 20 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
I admire you because of your effort in order to gain ethanol from wood.We all must consider that there are many waste woods in nature which we can use them in order to produce ethanol.
Comment 21 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
February 19, 2005
I have a question...Can you use the wood from Deconsturction of homes and buildings? A lot of it is crushed on site from bulldozing and can not be use much for anything besides the landfill or incineration. This would help in the recycling of buildings and the achieving a zero waste society.
Comment 22 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
March 1, 2005
Keep in mind the following:
1. In the natural world, "waste" wood either burns in fires, or, more often supports whole communities of decomposers. Remove the "waste" wood, and the effect on decomposers may have unforseen consequences
2. Wood is not just cellulose and lignan - it contains minerals that the tree expended energy to extract (via fungi) from soils. If you use the cellulose, you should return the minerals to help the next generation of trees.
3. It is best in my mind to use existing crop land as the primary energy producer rather than forests. Most Americans, at least, eat too much already!
4. Heat and pressure for depolymerizing cellulose can be obtained by pumping a cellulose-water-acid mixture down a 3-4 mile deep borehole. The GeneSyst Co. has patents on this process and hopefully will do something practical with them someday.
Comment 23 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
May 23, 2005
Here is a website showing the problems of Biomass Energy in Ireland. Ireland has been there, done that, and can't do it any more:

www.ipcc.ie/currentaction2005-14.html

Ireland is the "canary-in-the-coal-mine" for ALL Biomass wannabee countries.
Comment 24 of 30
No image available
Anonymous
May 23, 2005
In Ireland, the peat bogs are disappearing, because all the trees have been cut down for firewood, building materials and paper.
They have resorted to burning the earth under their feet. Burnt peat reeks!
Is that where the remaining forested parts of the earth are headed? To burn the earth beneath our feet? We are consuming even renewable resources faster than they can be renewed, so how can a positive spin be put on burning up any natural resource, when it too will become extinct?
Comment 25 of 30
No image available
July 27, 2005
wood-waste-to-ethanol plant to built on Vancouver Island

MEMSUSA (CanAm Ethanol One)

memsusa.com

biz.yahoo.com/bw/050613/135472.html?.v=1

biz.yahoo.com/bw/050622/225039.html?.v=1
Comment 26 of 30
No image available
September 13, 2005
Greetings, what is the farmgate price farmers will receive for the biomass?
Comment 27 of 30
No image available
April 7, 2006
It is clear that many of the adversarial postings to this article have been produced by well-intentioned folks, but it is obvious that many of them have a limited context.

The area in which we operate wood processing plants is full of waste wood piles that exist simply for lack of a viable use for the material. These piles are considered a liability because they produce acidic leachate.

The key element will be the development of technology of the appropriate scale to make use of this currently untapped feedstock. In my experience, deforestation is driven by a lack of appropriate scale wherein large facilities require unsustainable volumes of raw materials to stay viable. This we must avoid.
Comment 28 of 30
No image available
June 3, 2006
I applaud your effort to use wood as a source for ethanal, both as a citizen who desires to see the U.S. free itself from foreign oil, and as one who desires to see forests for health and sustainability.

Many of the previous writers mention protecting "natural forests" from this use. They need to realize that our forests are in need of human intervention. U.S. forests are overstocked, vulnerable to fire, insects, and disease, and consisting of species that are indeed, not natural. Carefully thinning the forests and using the material, when feasible, is one of the tools managers can use to moving our forests towards a more natural state that is less prone to fire, insects and disease, and more aesthetically pleasing.
Comment 29 of 30
No image available
January 8, 2007
Interesting info on Ireland. What is the population density of Ireland? and what is the population density of North America? and what is the population density of the Middle East? China? Point being whether one should use any particular renewable resource depends on where one is and how much of that resource is available. We now have 7 billion people on this planet, more than enough, and if that madness isn't stopped eventually the entire planet will indeed be turned into an ugly deforested desert - whether we burn the biomass or eat it. ergo, the intelligent use of wood for ethanol in North America will be ok - everything in moderation - except intelligence please.
Comment 30 of 30
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Michigan Economic Development Corporation Solar Nation PVPowered Inc. Johnson Controls, Inc. Prism Solar Technologies, Inc Schüco
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo