Photo Credit: "Advanced Materials" via the University of Toronto
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (27) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
January 11, 2005

Solar Photovoltaic Breakthrough Taps Infrared Light

Toronto, Canada [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Polymer-based solar photovoltaic cells are one of the most highly anticipated fields in the solar industry these days. While current technologies on the market struggle to match their crystalline counterparts in terms of price-per-watt, researchers are on the hunt. Researchers like a team from the University of Toronto that recently announced a breakthrough in capturing light energy from beyond the visible spectrum.

"These flexible photovoltaics could harness half of the sun's spectrum not previously accessed."

- Josh Wolfe, Managing Partner and nanotechnology venture capital investor at Lux Capital in Manhattan.

In a paper published on the Nature Materials Web site on January 9, senior author and Professor Ted Sargent, Nortel Networks -- Canada Research Chair in Emerging Technologies at the University of Toronto's Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and his team report on their achievement in tailoring matter to harvest the sun's invisible, infrared rays.

"We made particles from semiconductor crystals which were exactly two, three or four nanometres in size," Sargent said. "The nanoparticles were so small they remained dispersed in everyday solvents just like the particles in paint," explains Sargent.

Sargent's team then tuned the tiny nanocrystals to catch light at very long wavelengths. The result is a sprayable infrared detector.

"Existing technology has given us solution-processible, light-sensitive materials that have made large, low-cost solar cells, displays, and sensors possible, but these materials have so far only worked in the visible light spectrum," Sargent said.

The discovery may help in the quest for cheaper, more efficient renewable energy resources. Specifically, it could help drive up the efficiencies of current polymer-based solar cells which hold the potential to be manufactured at a lower cost than current crystalline silicon cells but have so far been unable to match crystalline power conversion efficiencies.

"Companies have already been formed which have discovered how to make roll-to-roll, large area, plastic photovoltaics," Sargent said. "They face the challenge of low efficiencies in harvesting the sun's power. Our work has the potential to improve these efficiencies considerably.

Sargent expects their research breakthrough could see commercial implementation within 3 to 5 years.

Flexible, roller-processed solar cells have the potential to harness the sun's power, but efficiency, flexibility and cost are going to determine how that potential becomes practice, said Josh Wolfe, Managing Partner and nanotechnology venture capital investor at Lux Capital in Manhattan.

"These flexible photovoltaics could harness half of the sun's spectrum not previously accessed," he said.

Professor Peter Peumans of Stanford University, who has reviewed the U of T team's research, also acknowledges the groundbreaking nature of the work.

"Our calculations show that with further improvements in efficiency, combining infrared and visible photovoltaics, could allow up to 30 percent of the sun's radiant energy to be harnessed, compared to six percent in today's best plastic solar cells," Peumans said.

U of T electrical and computer engineering graduate student Steve MacDonald carried out many of the experiments that produced the world's first solution-processed photovoltaic in the infrared.

"The key was finding the right molecules to wrap around our nanoparticles," he explains. "Too long and the particles couldn't deliver their electrical energy to our circuit; too short, and they clumped up, losing their nanoscale properties. It turned out that one nanometer - eight carbon atoms strung together in a chain - was 'just right'."

Other members of the U of T research team are Gerasimos Konstantatos, Shiguo Zhang, Paul W. Cyr, Ethan J.D. Klem, and Larissa Lavina of electrical and computer engineering; Cyr is also with the Department of Chemistry. The research was supported in part by the Government of Ontario through Materials and Manufacturing Ontario, a division of the Ontario Centres of Excellence; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through its Collaborative Research and Development Program; Nortel Networks; the Canada Foundation for Innovation; the Ontario Innovation Trust; the Canada Research Chairs Programme; and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

Information courtesy of Sonnet L'Abbe, University of Toronto
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (27)
 
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
If you want to concentrate, you must use concentrator cells. These are designed to operate at dozens or hundreds of suns and can get to almost 40% eff.
But you won't get anywhere with polymer cells in a concentrator, you need multilayer gallium/indium/phosporus and so on.
Comment 1 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
The mirror thing doesn't work as well as one would hope. The modules turn all brown and there efficiency drops like a rock. At a guess it is like fertilizing plants. One serving is great, but two kills
Comment 2 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
It's actually spelled Hubbert's Peak, read the book, Amazon.com has it, it really keeps me going in my line of work as a PV Installer.
Comment 3 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
alittle off topic but if you have 10 square meters of "sunshine" that currently will return 6-30 percent energy if all 10 square meters are covered with combind infrared and visible photovoltaics can't you rediredt 9 square meters via mirrors/optics and push past the 30 percent recovery on the last 1 square meter of photovoltaics?
Comment 4 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
Maybe this will make people start paying a little more attention to renewable resources. It is sick how much alternative energy supplies are available, yet we still stick so much to the old wasteful, harmful variety.
Comment 5 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
Canada, great! Use all the sunshine you have! Even now I'm running 100% on solar and wind in Canada.
Comment 6 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 11, 2005
The sooner the better! Herberts Peak is just around the corner, if not already here.
Alternate sources of energy are going to be required as we face shortages of oil.
Another Canadian first! Great!
Comment 7 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 12, 2005
If I were a solar collector,
I'd cover at least a hectare.
I'd suck in the sun,
for profit and fun;
and become a grid defector.

Bud Hardman
Suncoast Plumbing
Sunny Florida
Comment 8 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 12, 2005
Here is an idea I give away free. Use solar energy to make steam rather than electricity. Place inflated plastic parabolic mirrors of area about one mile in diameter in geostationary orbit. Focus the reflected beam to 100 suns on a heat receptor of .1 mile in diameter mounted near an existing hydroelectric plant. Use the steam to pump water to the lake behind the dam, and then generate electricity in the normal manner.
Comments appreciated.

W.F.Schreiber, Prof of EE, Emeritus, MIT
wfs@mit.edu
Comment 9 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 13, 2005
Can someone who is educated and experienced in this field tell the rest of us what this might mean in the not too distant future in possibly allowing the average suburban house to go off the grid? Is this a reasonable posibility? Just think of the social and economic ramifications if this could happen. Thanks for your input.
Comment 10 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 13, 2005
I finished my studies in Materials Engineering with a state of the art prospect on plastic solar cells and found it was an impressive and very potential field to develop photovoltaic devices. I didn`t found in the bibliography worked any mention of this group but many about professor Peumans, whose calculations may asset this can be really a good step forward.
Comment 11 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 13, 2005
Keep up on this research.
Comment 12 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 13, 2005
This paper was published on the Nature Materials Web site on January 9? I don't think so. At least I couldn't find it @ http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/dynapage.taf?file=/nmat/journal/v4/n1/index.html
Feb's. is not out so what gives? I get Material Alerts which also provide (the same) contents. Whenever I try http://www.light.utoronto.ca/tsargent/ I get a "connection failure". Maybe Canada is retaliating for a beef? Something got pulled somewhere.
Comment 13 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 13, 2005
This is a great milestone for the industry. I have a question: What is the residency time of the energy from the infared region in these polmer cells, and is there a correlation to property degradation of the polmer cells?
Comment 14 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 14, 2005
Sargent's new solar material gets my vote for best news of the year. If it really results in the efficiencies claimed it means an eventual huge loss of money for US Oil companies and the US military industrial complex that profits from defending big oil.
This could lead to less war and less money for the aforementioned industries to use to corrupt politicians of all stripes in Wash, DC
It might lead to my country becoming a respected member of the community of civilized nations again. Bravo Canada!!!! J. Reid, Portland, OR, USA
Comment 15 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 14, 2005
The "Coast to Coast" radio show fellow read the story as ~iirc~ 'You may be recharging your cell-phone with your shirt. Researchers in Toronto have found a more efficient way to convert sunlight to electricity' etc. flexible materials etc.

Way to go, Canada!!!!!Please keep the patents away from bloated U.S. companies!!!
Comment 16 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 15, 2005
Wearing the Transport/Logistics hat, & respectful of the significance of ANY breakthru in renewable that pans out, we must still put our shoulders to the wheel of rolling efficiency in transportation. The railway matrix the USA left behind in1950, as we indulged in the seemingly unlimited petroleum of the World, must be re-instated. Railways, linked to renewable, must be vastly expanded in capacity & reach

Examples for discussion can be found in The Association For The Study Of Peak Oil & Gas, www dot peakoil dot net. Please see Newsletter42, Article374. Also, see MASS TRANSIT Magazine, 11-04, p.70, Tahoe Valley Lines request for proposals.

Breakthrough is good, nuts & bolts preparation to assure societal COHESION is better yet. Gunnar Henrioulle
Comment 17 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 16, 2005
R. Worthington, thanks for your response. I am making plans for designing and building my retirement home and I am researching energy saving technologies for private residences. I want to combine the Passive Annual Heat Storage System (no fuels, no mechanical devices) to heat and cool my house as described at www.earthshelters.com and a system for making my own electricity. Hence my interest in this new breakthrough. I highly recommend that people check out this website as it is NOT about the typical earth sheltered homes we are all familiar with, rather, it presents a "new" technology for heating and cooling houses that is very simple.
Comment 18 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 16, 2005
Solar energy will not get any respect until it unifies. Photovoltiacs will certainly benefit from this latest work. How ever there is more to solar energy than electricity.

Chopwood, Conserve energy by insulating your home to modern standards including doors and windows. Integrate passive solar designs where possible. Buy Energy Star Appliances. Eliminate incandescent bulbs and CRT monitors. Now consider heat recovery systems from plumbing and ventilation then consider SUPLEMENTAL solar hot water and solar heating by now you are using so little energy that you can seriously consider grid connected or off grid alternative systems with a much smaller footprint vs reaping the savings from these investments you have made.
Comment 19 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 17, 2005
Is there an energy-policy deed uglier than when Nancy Reagan removed Jimmy Carter's PV panels from the roof of the White House?

Back to the topic of Steve MacDonald's brilliance!

Ok! Wow! Where are the mainstream news stories on this? MacDonald and Sargent's chain of 8 carbon molecules miraculously taps the energy of infra-Red light. What about the opposite end of the spectrum?...(I'm believing from the article above that only visible light is converted to electricity by the existing crystalline and existing polymer PV cells)...Is there another efficiency breakthrough possible? ...to harness the energy in wavelengths of invisible light "beyond (Roy g. biV) Violet"?
Comment 20 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 18, 2005
In answer to Chopwood's question, the math works out. Even without the extensive energy-saving measures Robert Worthington recommended, the typical suburban roof has enough square footage for 30% efficiency to power it, even with traditional mechanical air conditioning. However, this breakthrough in solar panels lends nothing to the notion of going off grid. Solar panels only provide power during the day. Night time power demands must still be met, and while 30% efficiency actually provides a surplus during the day, there is still the problem of local energy storage. Local storage is still difficult, expensive, and dangerous. The grid will be around a while yet. It may never go away.
Comment 21 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 18, 2005
Hello,

will this story practically come true, or will it just stay as a scientific article for readers ?!?

Scientifically it is very exciting. To work against the global warming it is very fine.

But there is a big problem...

Oil lobbies won't be really happy about that, and you can be absolutely sure that they will do their very best to put the potential patents under the carpet.

We have to be realistic. As long as ONLY money will lead the world, as long as ONLY investors will be interested in making money with this new kind of research, we won't go in the good direction.

With my best regards
Daniel
Comment 22 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 24, 2005
As a Canadian electrical engineer, I'm proud that Canada is advancing this technology (rather than some other technologies profitable just to war or other anti-social industries).

But to those not familiar with the field, the advancements mentioned here are significant but not surprising steps of ongoing international research. Significant barriers remain before such envisioned wide-spectrum photovoltaic devices are marketed.

Already though, Japan, with low interest rates & high electrical rates (e.g., 25c per kWh), finds photovoltaic power cheaper than grid power.

By applying more cost-effective photovoltaics, poor sunny countries will be able to afford greater refrigeration, air-conditioning, public health, & overall development.
Comment 23 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 25, 2005
Kudos to the CDN U of T team. Glad my tax dollars are spent wisely on the Universities, the cost benefit ratio and all that politics should go. We (canadain Universities) should be spending more on research within the energy sector (imho). I wish Steve M and his team the best, and get it patented asap!
M
Comment 24 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
January 28, 2005
I am very much elated and happy to learn about the polymer pv cells. It will be a great service to the society if it will be possible to reduce the price of pv cell systems comparable to conventional energy systems. At this moment pv technology is prohibitingly costly.
Comment 25 of 27
No image available
Anonymous
April 6, 2005
The nickel coin at room temperature radiates about 0.3 Watt of energy, IN THE INFRARED .... as do a lot of metals.

Think deeply about this ... solar energy is not available at night but ambient temperature is pretty much ... well all around us, so to speak.

A sheet of metal coupled to an infrared photovoltaic via an evacuated cavity would just suck heat out the surrounds and convert it to electricity..... where goeth entory then?
Comment 26 of 27
No image available
June 25, 2007
Well its a great step forward for the western world. Well done guys. I hope that the technology will be avaiable in Australia soon. Could you imagine the energy produced from spraying Sydney Harbour Bridge or Office towers with the stuff? YAHOOOOOOO
Comment 27 of 27
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Energy Ocean Conference Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group Conergy Inc. Energy Storage Summit Interstate Renewable Energy Council UL University
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo