Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: NREL
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (15) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
November 3, 2004

Colorado Voters Pass Renewable Energy Standard

Amendment Creates First Ever Voter-Approved Renewable Energy Standard
by Jesse Broehl, Editor, RenewableEnergyAccess.com
Denver, Colorado [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

In a major victory for renewable energy advocates in Colorado, voters in the state approved Amendment 37 on Tuesday's election day. This is the first time in the Nation's history that a renewable energy portfolio standard was put directly before voters rather than processed through a state's legislature.

"Reducing our nation and our state's reliance on foreign energy is an issue that should cross all party lines."

- Colorado Republican Rep. Lola Spradley

The initiative requires the state's largest utilities to obtain 3 percent of their electricity from renewable energy resources by 2007 and 10 percent by 2015 as well as establish a standard net metering system for homeowners and ranchers with small photovoltaic (PV) systems to connect to the power grid. The measure also calls for 4 percent of the mandated amount of renewable energy to come from solar resources.

According to the Associated Press, with 90 percent of precincts reporting, 912,008 voters, or 52 percent, had backed the proposal while 829,364, or 48 percent, opposed it.

These close margins echo the long, hard road for a renewable energy standard in Colorado. Legislation for a renewable portfolio standard sponsored by Republican Lola Spradley failed to pass into law earlier in 2004.

"Reducing our nation and our state's reliance on foreign energy is an issue that should cross all party lines," Spradley said in a statement.

It was the fourth time Colorado's legislators had rejected RPS legislation. Despite the sting of the legislative loss, proponents of a renewable energy standard decided to ask voters directly through a ballot initiative, where it ultimately found success.

The measure has faced consistent and strong resistance from electric utility companies, particularly Xcel Energy. Facing the possibility that voters could force the utility to use more renewable energy, Xcel Energy mounted a full-scale attack campaign in the weeks prior to election day.

While the federal government has done nothing to mandate national standards for renewables, states have themselves been a major driving force behind renewable energy, enacting their own mandates. Renewable energy industries and advocates form across the nation have been keenly aware of this progress and many eyes were on Colorado this election day.

"Noting that Colorado's legislature has failed to act, Ballot Initiative 37 affords the citizens of Colorado an alternative means for moving the state's economy towards a cleaner energy future," was the collective message from the Washington DC-based Sustainable Energy Coalition, a 21-member group of business, environmental, and energy policy members who work to support renewable energy at the national level.

The organization noted that while Colorado is endowed with abundant solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydroelectric resources, the state presently produces only 2 percent of its electricity from renewable energy.

Already 16 other states have enacted renewable energy requirements for their utilities and many require an even higher percentage of electrical generation to be from renewable energy than envisioned by Initiative 37.

New Mexico, for example, requires 10 percent renewable electricity by 2011, four years ahead of the Colorado proposal. Nevada requires 15 percent renewable electricity by 2013. New York State recently required that 25 percent of its electricity come from renewable sources by 2013.

The Sustainable Energy Coalition itself has called for a national renewable energy standard directing that no less than 20 percent of the nation's electricity should be generated by renewable energy resources by 2020, in addition to that already provided by hydropower.

Presidential hopeful Senator John Kerry called for the same national mandate. At the time of this article's publication, his odds for securing the presidency appear bleak.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (15)
 
No image available
November 3, 2004
Tripp, for more information on subsidies to the coal and natural gas industries read the recent RE Insider from Jim Rubens.

http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=17332

The McCain / Lieberman legislation had to do with creating a market for pollution and CO2 credits so power producers would start to see a business value in lowering their emissions.

- Editor
Comment 1 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 3, 2004
Here's a question, what are the per kWh subsidies for coal and natural gas? Wind is 1.8 cents/kWh, correct? And yes, I agree that at the federal level not much is going to happen over the next 4 years. What was that legislation that McCain and Lieberman sponsored? Does anyone know anything about that?
Comment 2 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 3, 2004
I hope you're right but with oilmen in office, I find it hard to believe they will do little more than give lip service to our industry while oil gas and coal get all the subs. This will really set our country back and we will lose further job growth to other countries who are persuing this technology vigorously.
Comment 3 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 3, 2004
I disagree. While it's unlikely that the Bush administration will actively encourage this sorta thing, they will take note of what happened here in Colorado. Beyond that, states are stepping up to the plate and filling in the void left by the Fed. What is it now, 17 states with RPS's. And at least two of those states have republican governors (CA, NY) who have perhaps the most agressive renewables initiatives in the country. So long as the states keep stepping up things will happen.
Comment 4 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 3, 2004
We have to wait another 5 years before renewables will have another chance to flourish.
Comment 5 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 4, 2004
Rod, It's amazing what advertising dollars can do. Xcel spent about a million dollars to advertise against 37. I know that in the weeks coming up to the elections they were running a lot of ads. Most people don't consider the external costs of fossil fuel consumption. They look at the electricity bill every month and that's what they know about energy costs. Still, despite Xcel's efforts to the contrary, 37 passed. I think that that says a lot actually. 52% of Coloradans were informed enough to call Xcel's bluff. When you think about it, that's pretty good considering they probably weren't seeing a lot of advertising about the true costs of Coal.

Cheers,

T Westminster, CO
Comment 6 of 15
No image available
November 4, 2004
Although early estimates said +70% of the people in Colorado were for Amendment 37 only 52% of the voters went for the initiative. 37 passed but did not engage the press as active supporters. My own efforts to get an article published in our small town paper were rejected because "it was going to pass anyway". We need the press to move Solar forward, even if we need to reinvent it. The press has given big oil (all extractive fuels and nuclear) a free ride. Even with the publicity about global warming, the end of oil and increasing pollution the press has not taken a stand that will move us forward.

For the past 20 years everyone has been taught that Solar is good but unattainable because it is too expensive. Marketing Solar is going to be easier than ever before because the big Oil guys have won which means they loose, they are running out of stuff to sell, they started a war and prices are escalating. There is documentation on the real cost of oil (all conventionals) and it is not pretty. Market Solar as cheaper than the real cost of fossil every chance you get.
Rod Garrison
Keenesburg CO
Comment 7 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 5, 2004
This an exciting new trend that hopefully will continue at an increasing speed. I have a dream that this nation and the World will achieve abundant, cheap, exhaust-free sources of energy. That will not only free us from being dependent on the Middle Eastern oil, but will drive a wave of incredible economic prosperity.
Comment 8 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 9, 2004
Where can one learn of state-by-state incentives for r.e.?
Comment 9 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 9, 2004
any good public renewable stock plays??lamurunner@yahoo.com
Comment 10 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 9, 2004
does a pure wind turbine project make economic sense???
Comment 11 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 9, 2004
FYI,
There is nothing to celebrate in Ken Salazar who formerly defended corporate polluters for a living. Let's call a spade a spade, please.
Comment 12 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
November 10, 2004
Go to www.dsireusa.org for state-by-state incentives.
Comment 13 of 15
No image available
Anonymous
May 12, 2005
For what LEAP spent in one season, a solar hot air/water system could have been installed in every residence of the state! The fact is conservation takes from profits and BUSHCO is for profit...PERIOD!
Comment 14 of 15
No image available
December 19, 2008
hi,
this is peter.for information on drug rehab ,please visit us so that you may clariffy your douts.
------------------------------------
colorado drug rehab
Comment 15 of 15
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Green Energy Promotions Navigant Consulting European Wind Energy Association 3TIER HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. Second Wind Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo