The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News, Information, and Companies.

The Carbon-Constrained World: Companies Ignore It At Their Risk

When U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham last year declared that "cap-and-trade is dead" in the wake of the failed federal climate change legislation that would have capped carbon emissions, many companies – both large and small – perhaps shelved their carbon reduction programs. Indeed, some companies might think they are now immune to carbon controls.

This would be a mistake.

The state of California remains committed to its ambitious cap-and-trade program, and state legislators remain positioned to fill the legislative vacuum left by the US Senate with a state-level program that promises to set the standard for other state and regional carbon reduction protocols. Despite years of litigation and regulatory uncertainty, California now stands just a few months away from potentially adopting the most comprehensive cap-and-trade bill this country has ever seen – including the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) now being scrutinized by state legislatures throughout the northeastern United States.

For regulated Californian businesses, the implications of this development are undeniable: remaining competitive in a carbon constrained economy requires companies to minimize their carbon footprint. To do so, companies must make fundamental organizational and behavioral changes and develop a much broader and deeper understanding of greenhouse gas (GHG) management vernacular. Among the leading concepts for companies to understand are GHG inventories and carbon offsets, among others.

But what about the rest of country? Surely this need not concern other states and their local businesses. Yet time and again business, cultural and financial trends have followed the same pattern: what happens in California matters for the rest of the country. In the case of cap-and-trade, it’s worth noting that California contains the largest U.S. state population, the largest U.S. state economy and represents roughly 6 percent of the country’s total GHG emissions. This has for decades made it the bellwether state for, among other indicators, national environmental regulation. Whether it’s been regulating insecticides or controlling automotive emissions, California has long set the bar for environmental protection in the United States.

This should serve as a wake-up call to companies – small and large - who think they are immune to carbon controls. Californians may soon be entering a carbon constrained world and could bring others with them. This is the time for businesses across the country to get a jump start on managing their own carbon footprint. Failing to do so, would mean being left behind by a growing number of more efficient and innovative companies, the likes of which California is known for.

Admittedly, budgets are tight these days, however, that should not stop companies from taking action. Minimizing one’s carbon footprint can lead to substantial cost savings and, through emission reductions such as offsets, can enable companies to achieve their climate goals cost-effectively. It is time we all take notice of what’s going in California and anticipate the inevitable – a carbon constrained world.




Greenpeace Raises Pressure on Internet Companies to Go Renewable

Andrew Burger, Contributor For at least four years, Greenpeace has been raising public awareness and putting pressure on the world's largest data and cloud computing center providers to fuel their operations with clean, renewable power. In May, Green...
A biogas plant concept from Weltec Biopower

Europe Versus Renewable Energy?

Tildy Bayar, Contributor Wednesday morning’s 'Regulation and the Marketplace' panel discussion at POWER-GEN Europe in Amsterdam got off to a lively start with a presentation from Randy Mott, president of Polish biogas- and geothermal-base...
Wind turbines

Why It's Time To Get Real About Energy Security

Hannah Smith, Contributor Energy is Europe’s quiet crisis. While the clamour of failing economies, desperate migrants and political clashes grabs the headlines, energy policy is rarely front-page news, but it should be — the statistics are shocking.

A Closer Look at Fossil and Renewable Energy Subsidies

Susan Kraemer, Contributor A new study by the International Monetary Fund puts the total cost of fossil fuel subsidies at approximately $10 million a minute globally, when health costs and environmental degradation are included, never mind the effect...


Volume 18, Issue 3


To register for our free
e-Newsletters, subscribe today:


Tweet the Editors! @megcichon @jennrunyon



Microgrid Global Innovation Forum

Microgrid Global Innovation Forum  This event brings together thoug...

Grid Edge Live

Grid Edge Live 2015 The impressive two and a half day agenda addresses k...

Energy Storage USA

Energy Storage USA Energy Storage USA is the only event in the United St...


Three Strategies to Reduce Customer Acquisition Costs

When facing soft costs, many solar installers often think of the costs s...

7 Tips For Active Listening

Selling efficiency is a two-way street: You can’t just bombard you...

A Baseball Cap, the #ElonEffect, and the Power of a Personal Solar ...

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the Elon Effect in relation to Tesla...


Renewable Energy: Subscribe Now

Solar Energy: Subscribe Now

Wind Energy: Subscribe Now

Geothermal Energy: Subscribe Now

Bioenergy: Subscribe Now