The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News, Information, and Companies.
Untitled Document

Why Falling Module Prices Lead to Lower-tilt Racking

Everyone is impressed with the cost reductions in solar modules over the last five year, dropping from $3.25/Wp in 2008 to below $0.70/Wp in 2013. This trend has made solar power competitive with fossil fuels in many markets, and has left many other technologies, such as amorphous silicon or concentrating PV, in the dust. This dramatic cost reduction also has significant implications for the design of a solar array, and even in which components should be used elsewhere in the system. In particular, the cost reduction of solar modules is having a major impact on the racking designs in solar – with implications for the winners & losers in that sector.

Racking and Ground Coverage Ratio (GCR)

Module racking provides the structural foundation (typically aluminum or steel) that secures the modules in place. There are many considerations for the choice of racking, including the application (rooftop versus ground-mount), the structural capacity of a rooftop, and the wind loads for the location and modules.   Additionally, the racking design is tied to the orientation and spacing of the modules, which has major implications for their energy yield. 

In particular, module spacing is the key driver of system yield and system size.  With wide spacing, modules are highly productive (since they are rarely shaded), but fewer can be installed at a project location.  As modules are designed closer together, the energy yield will go down from shading, but the array can hold more modules.   

Figure 1: System Yield versus Size.  As more modules are added to an array fixed area, inter-row shading will reduce the productivity of the system

The percentage of the array area covered by modules is known as the ground coverage ratio (GCR).  Engineers adjust GCR to maximize energy yield or profit, and the optimal choice of GCR is primarily a function of the module cost.  At high module prices, designers want to optimize the productivity of each module: since they are the biggest part of the budget, you want to use as few as possible while ensuring you maximize their energy production.  However, as module prices fall, the optimal GCR changes. It becomes advantageous to pack more modules into the array, even if the yield falls. With low module prices, the fixed costs and overhead become the biggest costs in the system. By increasing the total system size, those fixed costs can be spread out over a bigger system, reducing the LCOE. 

Implications for Racking Designs

Once we understand the dynamics of GCR optimization (power versus yield), we can extend this analysis to the racking tilt decision as well.

To maximize energy yield per module, the optimal design would be a tilt equal to the location’s latitude.  However, as modules are tilted flatter, they create less shade — and therefore can be spaced closer together without significantly reducing the productivity of the modules.

Figure 2: System Yield versus Size, 25-degree tilt and 5-degree tilt. While lower-tilt modules initially produce less than higher tilt, they will outperform at the highest system sizes.

Examining the GCR and energy yield curves of the alternative tilt systems, it becomes clear that the lower tilt maximizes the total energy generated from the array, by maintaining productivity at the largest system size. 

Figure 3: System Yield and Production. Lower-tilt modules enable the greatest total system production at the highest GCR.

The drive to maximize total profit, in a world of falling module prices, results in systems designed for maximum kWh production. This is a boon for manufacturers of low-tilt racking, and even creates opportunities for new racking designs that embrace this dynamic.  We can see this in the market, with products like Q-Flat racking from Hanwha Q Cells, and East-West racking products from Kinetic and PanelClaw. 

Polar Bear East West racking from Panel Claw 

Additional Considerations

Racking tilt isn’t only about system cost and performance.  There are a few other considerations, including the seasonality of the production (better in the summertime), the soiling rates (not as good for low-tilt modules), or the snow rates (low-tilt will do much worse with snow).  Finally, low-tilt racking can often reduce the wind load of a solar project, helping to reduce the total project cost.

Conclusion

The crash in module pricing had a well-documented effect on the module suppliers, forcing many companies into capitulation.  But the change in module prices is also having a dramatic effect on the other parts of the system. And in the brave new world of falling prices, those who understand system economics will have a leg up in profiting from the change.  

Lead image: Solar panels via Shutterstock

Untitled Document

RELATED ARTICLES

Welspun Commissions 52-MW Solar Power Plant in India

Vince Font Leading Indian solar developer Welspun Renewables has commissioned the construction of a massive solar plant in the state of Maharashtra. The planned 52-megawatt (MW) solar plant will be located in the city of Baramati. The...

Regional News from the July/August 2015 Digital Edition of Renewable Energy World

Renewable Energy World Editors EcoFasten Solar announced that it launched a new mounting "Rock-It System" that it would be displaying during Intersolar. Product compliance was determined through testing per UL Subject 2703, which reviews integr...

SkyPower Inks $2.2 Billion Deal for Massive Solar Power Plant in Kenya

Eric Ombok, Bloomberg Kenya’s Energy Ministry and SkyPower Global Ltd. will sign a $2.2 billion agreement on Sunday that paves the way for the Canadian company to develop a 1-gigawatt solar project in East Africa’s biggest economy. The solar pro...

Making a Match: How Solar Companies and Banks Hook Up

Jennifer Runyon The announcements are fairly frequent: SunPower Partners with Admirals Bank for $200 Million Solar Loan Program, Deutsche Bank to Lend $1 Billion for Japanese Solar Projects, Financing Partnerships Drive North Carolina's So...
I am a co-founder with Folsom Labs, a design and performance modeling application for solar PV plants. I previously worked in DC power optimizers (Tigo Energy), and PV modules (Abound Solar). I also maintain a solar-focused blog: http://thegree...

CURRENT MAGAZINE ISSUE

Volume 18, Issue 4
1507REW_C11

STAY CONNECTED

To register for our free
e-Newsletters, subscribe today:

SOCIAL ACTIVITY

Tweet the Editors! @megcichon @jennrunyon

FEATURED PARTNERS



EVENTS

Presenting at Infocast's Utility Scale Solar Summit 2015

Oct. 21, 2015 4:30-5:15pm Albie Fong, National Director, Solar Frontier ...

Utility Scale Solar Summit 2015

Oct. 21, 2015 4:30-5:15pm Albie Fong, National Director, Solar Frontier ...

5th Annual Hydro Plant Maintenance

Join maintenance professionals to discuss the challenges in maintenance ...

COMPANY BLOGS

Behind Every Good Decision

When something about your business isn’t working, you set out to c...

Clean Energy Patents Maintain High Levels in First Quarter, Solar L...

U.S. patents for Clean Energy technologies from the first quarter of 201...

An Overwhelming Paradox

I’m sure we’re all very familiar with the feeling of being o...

NEWSLETTERS

Renewable Energy: Subscribe Now

Solar Energy: Subscribe Now

Wind Energy: Subscribe Now

Geothermal Energy: Subscribe Now

Bioenergy: Subscribe Now  

 

FEATURED PARTNERS