The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News, Information, and Companies.

Renewable Energy, Contaminated Sites: A Match Made in Heaven or Insurmountable Development Hurdles?

At first blush, the siting of renewable energy projects on contaminated properties may seem like an ideal reuse of environmentally compromised sites. However, the redevelopment of contaminated properties can pose unique challenges for renewable energy projects. Overcoming these obstacles requires careful planning as well as communication with oversight agencies. Many agencies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have new programs in place to assist renewable energy developers with contaminated property redevelopment.

By way of example, consider the installation of a large scale solar facility on a closed and capped landfill.  The site may not be suitable for many other types of uses, and may therefore provide the solar developer with an appealing and lower cost location.  In addition, the reuse of the site for solar energy may be attractive to the community and to the oversight agency or agencies.  However, there are technical and legal challenges that need to be considered and accommodated in the project pro forma.

Technical challenges unique to the landfill location include issues such as disruption of the landfill material or landfill cap.  In addition, there may be geotechnical difficulties resulting from differential settlement of the landfill material.  There may also be practical challenges, such as designing access roads and connecting to existing transmission facilities.  Ideally, the proposed reuse of the site for solar would be considered during the landfill closure, so that technical issues could be addressed through the engineering of the closure.  If not, the solar developer will need a very complete understanding of the landfill closure plan and site to assess whether the proposed solar use is feasible. 

From a legal perspective, the solar developer will need to assess and avoid to the extent possible any liability associated with the landfill conditions.  Both owning and operating a contaminated site may potentially subject a developer to environmental liability.  Liability protections in the form of agency agreements, prepurchase investigations, and insurance will need to be explored.  The developer should also carefully consider any deed restrictions or other permitted use issues associated with the closure of the landfill.

Many contaminated sites are already under the control or supervision of an oversight agency, such as a local fire department or county, or a state or federal environmental agency.  These agencies are responsible for ensuring the safe and proper remediation of the contaminated site, and will likely also be involved in any site redevelopment.  At the federal level, the EPA has an active program in place to promote the reuse of contaminated sites for renewable energy projects. 

In 2008, EPA launched the RE-Powering America’s Land: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Initiative (RE-Powering Initiative) to encourage and facilitate the use of contaminated sites for renewable energy projects.  EPA has identified and mapped more than 11,000 contaminated sites and nearly 15 million acres that EPA believes have the potential for developing renewable energy facilities.  EPA offers an interactive mapping tool as well as national and state maps showing renewable energy development potential on EPA's RE-Powering Initiative website.

In 2012, EPA released its Handbook on Siting Renewable Energy Projects While Addressing Environmental Issues, which identifies and provides information regarding environmental site issues facing renewable energy projects during site cleanup.  The handbook also addresses considerations for integrating renewable energy into the Superfund, RCRA, and Brownfields cleanup processes. 

Communication with the applicable oversight agency is critical to successful redevelopment of a contaminated site for renewable energy.  As indicated by the EPA materials, many agencies are very supportive of renewable energy uses, and can provide a great deal of information and guidance through the process.  A cooperative relationship with the oversight agency or agencies can often result in reduced costs and delay avoidance, and is therefore an important element of project success.

Another consideration for renewable energy siting on contaminated properties is potentially available incentives for the projects.  The DSIRE website provides a good source of information on state, local, utility and federal incentives and policies promoting renewable energy project development.  DSIRE is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, and is maintained by the N.C. Solar Center and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council.

In conclusion, renewable energy projects sited on contaminated properties can be successful, but advance planning, communication, and understanding of the site's unique challenges are critical to that success.  The emerging agency support for these projects is likely to result in an increase in interest among project developers, and may result in an important industry-wide shift toward consideration of such sites. 

Lead image: Landfill via Shutterstock

RELATED ARTICLES

Wind turbines

Why It's Time To Get Real About Energy Security

Hannah Smith, Contributor Energy is Europe’s quiet crisis. While the clamour of failing economies, desperate migrants and political clashes grabs the headlines, energy policy is rarely front-page news, but it should be — the statistics are shocking.

Largest Solar Farm in Virginia Just Commissioned by Amazon Web Services

Renewable Energy World Editors Back in 2012, Amazon received a failing grade from Greenpeace regarding its use of renewable energy to power its cloud centers. Skip a couple years and in 2014 Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced a goal of achievi...

A Closer Look at Fossil and Renewable Energy Subsidies

Susan Kraemer, Contrubutor A new study by the International Monetary Fund puts the total cost of fossil fuel subsidies at approximately $10 million a minute globally, when health costs and environmental degradation are included, never mind the effect...

How to Win Planning Permission for Renewable Energy Projects (and Influence People)

Tildy Bayar, Contributor At Tuesday afternoon’s POWER-GEN Europe and Renewable Energy World Europe conference session in Amsterdam, Paul Davison of PR firm Proteus discussed how to best communicate with the public regarding renewable ener...
Emily L. Murray is a partner at Allen Matkins in Los Angeles whose practice focuses on environmental litigation, land use, and energy law. Emily's litigation practice includes federal and state court litigation of environmental claims related t...

CURRENT MAGAZINE ISSUE

Volume 18, Issue 3
1505REW_C11

STAY CONNECTED

To register for our free
e-Newsletters, subscribe today:

SOCIAL ACTIVITY

Tweet the Editors! @megcichon @jennrunyon

FEATURED PARTNERS



EVENTS

Microgrid Global Innovation Forum

Microgrid Global Innovation Forum  This event brings together thoug...

Grid Edge Live

Grid Edge Live 2015 The impressive two and a half day agenda addresses k...

GRC Fieldtrip - Long Valley Geology

Led by Gene Suemnicht and Duncan Foley In May of 1980, a strong earthqua...

COMPANY BLOGS

Signing a Solar Lease? Here are Five Things You Need to Know

Solar leases have grown in popularity, and they continue to be one of th...

DIY: Don’t Install Yourself

You finally made the choice to go solar. Seems like it might be pretty e...

Capturing Your Prospects' Attention In Three Sentences

You have about 15 seconds to capture your prospects’ attention, wh...

NEWSLETTERS

Renewable Energy: Subscribe Now

Solar Energy: Subscribe Now

Wind Energy: Subscribe Now

Geothermal Energy: Subscribe Now

Bioenergy: Subscribe Now  

 

FEATURED PARTNERS