The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News, Information, and Companies.
Untitled Document

Stimulus Drives Need For PEP

Although the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) provides significant economic incentives for investing in renewable energy projects, GAAP earnings patterns may negatively impact investors should they choose to ignore liquidation provisions in tax equity partnership structures. We are proposing that investors negotiate Partnership Earnings Protection (PEP) to address potential issues with GAAP earnings patterns.

For example, in a representative $100M project using the cash grant the tax investor realizes an erratic earnings pattern and significant pre-tax losses (Earnings before Tax or EBT) in the early years of the project. With PEP, this same investment example produces a smoother earnings pattern with no losses in any period. PEP smoothes earning patterns by structuring the partnership liquidation terms, better reflecting a partners’ economic interest in the investment.

Cash Grant Impacts GAAP Earnings

When the market elected to use the ITC Cash Grant instead of Production Tax Credits (PTCs), the interaction between the financing structure and the accounting methodology caused earnings calculations to change dramatically. U.S. based corporations participating in flipping partnerships typically use the HLBV (Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value) accounting method to allocate project earnings between partners.  This method uses a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership’s business at the end of each financial reporting period to determine each partner’s share of book earnings from the business. 

Prior to the ITC Cash Grant, the after-tax earnings pattern was generally consistent with the economics of the investment. Although EBT typically reflected a small loss for the tax investor seeking PTCs, these were relatively insignificant compared to the after-tax earnings. Unlike the PTC incentive, the ITC Cash Grant flows through the HLBV earnings calculation and dramatically affects EBT. Although liquidation provisions were never something to ignore, the introduction of the ITC Cash Grant increased the importance of structuring and understanding the implications of liquidation terms. This situation is true for both solar and wind projects utilizing a flipping partnership and the Cash Grant.

Structure Partnerships to Protect Earnings (PEP)

Partnership Earnings Protection (PEP) is an approach to analyze and structure the liquidation waterfall to produce earnings more consistent with the base economics and a partner’s interest in the deal.  However, PEP only adjusts the pattern of earnings, not the aggregated total allocated to each partner.

To illustrate the point, take an example of a $100M project.  Financing for the project uses a capital structure comprised of cash grant (28%), project debt (40%), tax equity (22%) and sponsor equity (10%).  Figure #1 shows the tax equity’s share of pre-tax earnings resulting from a liquidation waterfall that mirrors the base case rules - complete the cash sweep and achieve the tax equity’s flip yield.  In some periods, the other partner realizes significant earnings while the tax equity has large losses. Note the total of the partners’ earnings is a zero-sum game as it totals to the earnings at the business level.

Figure 1:  EBT using Default Liquidation Rules

Figure 2 (below) shows the HLBV results of a liquidation waterfall modified with PEP to address (1) post-flip deferred tax liabilities (minimum gain), as well as (2) losses in the early years.  The total earnings are still the same in both graphs; however, there is a much improved sharing of the earnings between the partners with the PEP case, though some smaller losses have now been pushed to later years.

 

Figure 2:  EBT with PEP, 1st Pass

Figure #3 shows the impact of further PEP structuring to address the remaining losses and pattern of earnings.  As is evident, the losses have been eliminated and the pattern is now consistent with what an investor would expect for an investment that declines over time.  This example highlights the importance of structuring liquidation waterfall rules similarly to the base case economics in order to achieve partner financial objectives.

 

 

Figure 3:  EBT with PEP, 2nd Pass

Though PEP does not change the total earnings of any partner, it will change the sharing of cash in a real liquidation scenario.  However, since the original earnings patterns could be viewed as an unintended consequence of the business, making the PEP adjustments are likely justifiable and reasonable during deal negotiations.

 

 

A Structuring Solution to Earnings Exists

ARRA offers the industry new opportunities for growth, but also brings additional complexity to deal structuring and negotiation.  For partners that report GAAP earnings, it would be an oversight to use a default waterfall structure in liquidation without first examining the impact on earnings.  PEP (Partnership Earnings Protection) combines methodology and structuring analytics to mitigate HLBV earnings challenges.  Project sponsors and tax investors need to consider PEP before deciding on their next renewable energy project investments.

Dennis Moritz (top) has been a principal with Advantage for Anaylsts since its founding in 2004. His experience in financial analysis and modeling covers over 20 years in structuring partnerships, leases and other forms of financing for power projects and asset finance. He can be reached at dennis@advantageforanalysts.com.

Rajiv Advani (left) is head of Client Services for Advantage for Analysts where he manages all client project delivery and relationships.  Mr. Advani has over 15 years of professional experience in strategy consulting and client services management.

The Authors do not represent or warrant the accuracy, adequacy, timeliness, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information provided in connection with this article, which is provided “as is”.  The Authors do not provide tax, legal, or accounting advice and recommends that readers retain the services of a counsel to render opinions on specific transactions.

Untitled Document

Get All the Renewable Energy World News Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to Renewable Energy World or email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest news and information.

 Subscribe Now

RELATED ARTICLES

offshore wind

Hitachi Plans to Add Production Line for Offshore Wind Parts

Chisaki Watanabe, Bloomberg Hitachi Ltd. plans to expand its reach into the market for offshore wind projects by adding a production line to make...
Renewable energy

Leading US ICT Companies Renewables Use at 14%, and Growing

Andrew Burger Electricity consumption in the global information and communications technology (ICT) industry is growing rapidly. An...
Wind farms

Western: Streamlined Environmental Review Process for Wind Farms in Midwest ‘Takes Effect Right Away’

Jennifer Delony Western in an Aug. 26 record of decision (ROD) adopted a standardized process for collecting information and evaluati...

NextEra Commits to Hawaii’s Clean Power Goal, Local Management

Lynn Doan, Bloomberg NextEra Energy Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. made 50 new commitments as part of their proposal to merge ...

PRESS RELEASES

Canadian Solar Wins Five Solar Power Projects Totaling 185 MW in Brazil

These power projects were won under a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the B...

$100 Off of 5-day Advanced PV Project Experience. Download a Topic Schedule.

Assemble, ground, energize, and commission a complete grid-tied SolarEdge system from s...

Intersolar AWARD „Solar Projects in India“ – Applications being accepted until September 18

The Intersolar AWARD in the category Solar Projects in India honors projects in the fie...

National Thought Leaders to Present on Today's Clean Energy Issues & Trends During IREC's 3iForum at Solar Power International

"An encore to the standing-room-only sessions the past two years, IREC again brings som...

FEATURED BLOGS

Washington, DC Bridges the Solar Gap

The District of Columbia has enjoyed 15 years of strong economic growth. But prosperity is spread unevenly across the...

Sell Through Hypothesis

You first learned to hypothesize, or make educated guesses, in grade school science class. Now it’s time to ref...

Cronimet / THEnergy study: In solar for mines size does not always matter - Reducing CAPEX with energy efficiency and load shifting

Munich, September 2015. Mining companies are constantly gaining interest in solar solutions because frequently solar ...

Final Program Now Available for GRC Annual Meeting & GEA Geothermal Energy Expo

GRC Annual Meeting & GEA Geothermal Energy Expo - Final Program from

FINANCIAL NEWS

CURRENT MAGAZINE ISSUE

Volume 18, Issue 4
1507REW_C11

STAY CONNECTED

To register for our free
e-Newsletters, subscribe today:

SOCIAL ACTIVITY

Tweet the Editors! @jennrunyon

FEATURED PARTNERS



EVENTS

Doing Business in Europe – in partnership with GWEC, the Global Win...

There is now 128.8 GW of installed wind energy capacity in the EU (appro...

Doing Business in South Africa – in partnership with GWEC, the Glob...

Wind Energy in South Africa has been expanding dramatically, growing fro...

Distributed Wind Energy Workshop

Description: Distributed wind energy is electricity that is produced for...

COMPANY BLOGS

Clean Energy Patents Maintain High Levels in First Quarter, Solar L...

U.S. patents for Clean Energy technologies from the first quarter of 201...

Fact Check: AWEA represents American wind power

The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) is proud of its members for ...

Koch Professor drops his Koch title, still makes same errors plus s...

The Koch Professor’s title isn’t the only thing that’s...

NEWSLETTERS

Renewable Energy: Subscribe Now

Solar Energy: Subscribe Now

Wind Energy: Subscribe Now

Geothermal Energy: Subscribe Now

Bioenergy: Subscribe Now  

 

FEATURED PARTNERS